the basic model doesn't have raid, but yes you can always choose PATA/SATA...I'm going for the intel d865perl.
I saw it had Raid on it. It isn't a problem for you?
Asio,sts, and pci
Well,thisone is basic, right? It has raid. But hey, if you can turn it off it's allright.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: cream on 2005-02-19 16:22 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: cream on 2005-02-19 16:50 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: cream on 2005-02-19 16:22 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: cream on 2005-02-19 16:50 ]</font>
ok, one last question. 
I didn't found the 'basic' d865perl. I did found the d865perl with everything on it.
Is the performance the same as the 'basic' if I switch everything off (LAN, RAID, IEEE 1394a) or is it better to keep searching for the basic board with nothing on it? There are not much Intel dealers in Holland it seems... One shop didn't even know Intel boards existed. sigh...

I didn't found the 'basic' d865perl. I did found the d865perl with everything on it.
Is the performance the same as the 'basic' if I switch everything off (LAN, RAID, IEEE 1394a) or is it better to keep searching for the basic board with nothing on it? There are not much Intel dealers in Holland it seems... One shop didn't even know Intel boards existed. sigh...
Today I also did some testings.
So I did this:
Scope S/P pci card in G4 dual1.25 on system9.2
connected with optical cable with RME Fireface 800 like standalone converter to monitors genelec S30D in studio.
I played track from SparkXL thru asio16 bit driver stereo on scope platform routed directly to adat out.
Track that I played sounds much inferior on scope where was slave to Fireface800 because it has superiour word clock(StedyClock-No Jitter) than in the OSX on Peak 4 CoreAudio driver.And when the scope is set on master mode it is even worse.
Difference is this: Stereo is much wider ,high freq. was much more defined and that's why I heard Eff on voice much more better.Dynamic was better too.
Conclusion: Asio driver is not for professional use for shure.
That's why I spent two years trying to make high quality mix and I never succeded.But with LogicPro6 it was peace of cake. That dither system Powr is perfect.No more tiny little sound on 16 bit.Cubase is definitly out ,and it never worked perfectly.I used Cubase since version 2 and it never was flawless like Logic.
So I did this:
Scope S/P pci card in G4 dual1.25 on system9.2
connected with optical cable with RME Fireface 800 like standalone converter to monitors genelec S30D in studio.
I played track from SparkXL thru asio16 bit driver stereo on scope platform routed directly to adat out.
Track that I played sounds much inferior on scope where was slave to Fireface800 because it has superiour word clock(StedyClock-No Jitter) than in the OSX on Peak 4 CoreAudio driver.And when the scope is set on master mode it is even worse.
Difference is this: Stereo is much wider ,high freq. was much more defined and that's why I heard Eff on voice much more better.Dynamic was better too.
Conclusion: Asio driver is not for professional use for shure.
That's why I spent two years trying to make high quality mix and I never succeded.But with LogicPro6 it was peace of cake. That dither system Powr is perfect.No more tiny little sound on 16 bit.Cubase is definitly out ,and it never worked perfectly.I used Cubase since version 2 and it never was flawless like Logic.
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
Deneb,
First, this is pure bullshit...
Second, this response wasn't related at all with this particular thread.
Third, no need to post the same complains in all the forums here.
Maybe you had problem with creamware and feel revenge by spreading things?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2005-02-27 14:46 ]</font>
First, this is pure bullshit...
Second, this response wasn't related at all with this particular thread.
Third, no need to post the same complains in all the forums here.
Maybe you had problem with creamware and feel revenge by spreading things?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2005-02-27 14:46 ]</font>
Do you have Ears? Can you notice the difference between recorded audio on Vdat and Cubase???On 2005-02-27 14:57, garyb wrote:
this IS bullshit. also, i can tell from your post that you are NOT an engineer or anyone fit to judge ANY audio product. you are just someone with an axe to grind. if you are happy with your new machine, fine. go use it.