When used with the sync plate, Pulsar/SCOPE can run at sample rates of 176.4kHz, 192kHz and even 384kHz - making the system an incredible tool for any cutting edge digital audio configuration.
.. So I guess it should work . I would probably try those key-frequencies mentioned there. But just remember that 196KHz-mode is four times the more DSP resources per plugin than in 48KHz-mode.
And I wouldn't know how to record anything over 96KHz via a Scope card. Perhaps via AES/EBU. But you should definitely be able to work internaly with that rate.
what do you mean exactly by saying you can work internally on higher sample rates than 96khz?
lets say that i want to burn a dvd-audio at 24bit/192khz, taking signal from an external source via aes/ebu or by having a wav file of this s/rate. what do i have to do?
scope must be slave in that case i guess....
hello voidar
1.did you test scope as slave on higher s/rates than 96khz? or any other scope user?
2.what is DSD recorder?
3. is BNC the best connection for wordclocks?
_________________
ELVIS LIVES
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ARCADIOS on 2005-12-31 09:28 ]</font>
1. extremely high sample rates are pointless but do what you like. the specc from cwa says that you CAN slave to very high rates(like 192khz for pro tools geeks). my nanoclocks generates sync that high. scope's internal clock won't do it, but in slave mode the internal clock isn't used.
2. afaik, bnc is the only possible wordclock connector.
On 2005-12-31 07:22, ARCADIOS wrote:
hello voidar
1.did you test scope as slave on higher s/rates than 96khz? or any other scope user?
2.what is DSD recorder?
3. is BNC the best connection for wordclocks?
_________________
ELVIS LIVES
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ARCADIOS on 2005-12-31 09:28 ]</font>
. I would probably try those key-frequencies mentioned there. But just remember that 196KHz-mode is four times the more DSP resources per plugin than in 48KHz-mode.
