Waldorf Oscs vs Microwave XT
I have an opportunity to buy a Microwave XT for a great price - it looks like a great synth but I'm wondering is it worth getting considering I can possibly replicate most of its functionality and sound in Modular 3 with the Waldorf oscs etc. Or can I? Do the oscs really sound like genuine Waldorf oscs and is there more to the hardware version?
If the price is real great, buy the Microwave XT... and then U have real one plus Creamware's emulation 
Hardware + Scope = heaven of musician
Remember, the life is only one... all depends how many children U have and/or how many bucks in your pocket!
If the price is great what's the problem?
If U don't like it U can sell it after one deep tryout @ bigger price.

Hardware + Scope = heaven of musician

Remember, the life is only one... all depends how many children U have and/or how many bucks in your pocket!
If the price is great what's the problem?
If U don't like it U can sell it after one deep tryout @ bigger price.

It's only $500 - I believe that's a good price. Thing is I could get the Quantum Wave for less but I can't run many voices on my system. I don't have enough hands-on knowledge of either the Wave or the Microwave XT to really know which is the best option - I just like the sound - thats why I was wanting some more "expert" advice.
About the price, 500$ is good, 700$ is the average, here some review, info, 2hand prices:On 2006-04-29 10:26, Kymeia wrote:
It's only $500 - I believe that's a good price....
http://www.sonicstate.com/synth/waldorf_microwavext.cfm
http://www.sonicstate.com/synth_reviews ... wavext.cfm
http://www.harmony-central.com/Synth/Da ... XT-01.html
http://www.vintagesynth.com/index2.html
I have an XT and I'm very happy with it.
You can use all those knobs to control anything when you are not using it, plus you get many filters not available in the scope platform.
You can create your own wavetables, plus you get a hardware synth different than anything else out there, with the possibility to free up some dsp resources from your scope card.
If it's just for the oscilators, stick with scope and don't buy the microwave.
Martin
You can use all those knobs to control anything when you are not using it, plus you get many filters not available in the scope platform.
You can create your own wavetables, plus you get a hardware synth different than anything else out there, with the possibility to free up some dsp resources from your scope card.
If it's just for the oscilators, stick with scope and don't buy the microwave.
Martin
There are significant differences between the hardware and creamware version. Osc sync is not offered nor is the quality setting which allowed for aliasing to be turned on or off among other things. With the hardware you also get various filter types/shapers (flexor could probably help here), modulation options, arpeggiator and most importantly bpm sync on your wave envelope; something which is definatetly not offered in scopes multi segment envs.
I sold mine a few tears ago now for £350+shipping to a guy in the states just before waldorf went under. The reason behind getting rid of such a unique synth was because although it allowed for eight individual voices to play at the same time, it only had two stereo outs so no processing of all individual voices was possible. The internal fx were very weak, and waldorf had promised to further update the software to change the quality and provide further enhancements...which never happend.
It's a decent synth, but honestly there are many soft synths that have surpassed its original specs so a decent laptop and controller in my case was the better option.
In hardware the only other synth which I feel surpasses the XT (not including the overpriced Wave) is the Korg wavestation. You could pick up a wavestaion even cheaper than the price you're quoting these days.
I sold mine a few tears ago now for £350+shipping to a guy in the states just before waldorf went under. The reason behind getting rid of such a unique synth was because although it allowed for eight individual voices to play at the same time, it only had two stereo outs so no processing of all individual voices was possible. The internal fx were very weak, and waldorf had promised to further update the software to change the quality and provide further enhancements...which never happend.
It's a decent synth, but honestly there are many soft synths that have surpassed its original specs so a decent laptop and controller in my case was the better option.
In hardware the only other synth which I feel surpasses the XT (not including the overpriced Wave) is the Korg wavestation. You could pick up a wavestaion even cheaper than the price you're quoting these days.