Getting Scope to work on a Intel dualcore system
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
I recently build a PC with Intel D930, Asus P5WD2 Premium, 2GB Twinmos DDR2 667 memory,2 Luna II's and 1 Pulsar I. When trying to instal XP I noticed that intallation freezed after the copy phase if I choose the standard (Multiprocessor) PC after pressing F5. So I had to go for a ACPI APIC instal. This results in al lot of IRQ sharing, PCI overflow messages and freezes.
After install changing ACPI Multiprocessor drivers to Multiprocessor Standard PC caused a blue screen after reboot. So this was no option either.
Finally I found out that when you enable the PnP OS option in the BIOS and disable as much as possible that's sharing IRQ's with Scope cards in the XP Device Manager the system get's stable. I had to disable SATA, and one USB driver. My Pulsar I card still shares IRQ 10 with the Nvidia 6200 GE graphic card, but this doesn't seem to have any effect on performance.
Now I can work in XTC mode @4ms 44.1K without any clicks or plops running projects with 22 ASIO32 sent and return channels, Kontakt2 eight instruments to 16 outputs including convolution reverb, Intakt 8 channels out, PSP Mixpressor, Pristine Space convolution, a lot of Scope plugins.(XTC mode)
CPU usage in SX3 is a stable 35%. Hopes this helps anyone with dualcore installation problems.
Regards,
Marc
_________________
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.legaldownload.nl/artist/0/387"><img src="http://www.legaldownload.nl/banners/button.gif" border="0" width="186" height="72" vspace="4" hspace="4"></a>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-07-13 03:25 ]</font>
After install changing ACPI Multiprocessor drivers to Multiprocessor Standard PC caused a blue screen after reboot. So this was no option either.
Finally I found out that when you enable the PnP OS option in the BIOS and disable as much as possible that's sharing IRQ's with Scope cards in the XP Device Manager the system get's stable. I had to disable SATA, and one USB driver. My Pulsar I card still shares IRQ 10 with the Nvidia 6200 GE graphic card, but this doesn't seem to have any effect on performance.
Now I can work in XTC mode @4ms 44.1K without any clicks or plops running projects with 22 ASIO32 sent and return channels, Kontakt2 eight instruments to 16 outputs including convolution reverb, Intakt 8 channels out, PSP Mixpressor, Pristine Space convolution, a lot of Scope plugins.(XTC mode)
CPU usage in SX3 is a stable 35%. Hopes this helps anyone with dualcore installation problems.
Regards,
Marc
_________________
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.legaldownload.nl/artist/0/387"><img src="http://www.legaldownload.nl/banners/button.gif" border="0" width="186" height="72" vspace="4" hspace="4"></a>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-07-13 03:25 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
I am inspired even more as I am gathering up my parts for a Core 2 Duo DAW w/ SFP and Energy XT. Don't know of anyone using a similar set up but I will make a posting of failure/sucsess. I also have read that I can go w/o ASIO. I was hopiong that is the case as I will have 3 x 15 DSP cards, and EnergyXT, with a possible addition of Bidule. This world of modular has me all juiced up. It is nice to hear that Intel still is stable as usual.
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Let's leave politics to the Off-topic discussion forum, please? Not everyone here subscribes to the same views (except that we love CreamWare, I hope!). 
Shayne

Shayne
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com
Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
http://www.melodious-synth.com
Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
Marc di Ruiter,
How is the PCI-e graphics card on the new standard working 4 you? I just recieved my sample CPU, and am building a second SFP DAW w/ VST host. I always used the good old 2D Matrox cards, but I feel the Matrox P650 is a little overkill. My DAWMAN tells me a good 100 USD NVidia card will work fine, what say you. I was thinking of the eVGA GeForce 7300GT 16x PCI-e.
_________________
Jimmy V.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: scope4live on 2006-07-16 17:28 ]</font>
How is the PCI-e graphics card on the new standard working 4 you? I just recieved my sample CPU, and am building a second SFP DAW w/ VST host. I always used the good old 2D Matrox cards, but I feel the Matrox P650 is a little overkill. My DAWMAN tells me a good 100 USD NVidia card will work fine, what say you. I was thinking of the eVGA GeForce 7300GT 16x PCI-e.
_________________
Jimmy V.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: scope4live on 2006-07-16 17:28 ]</font>
Hello all Zs,
I'm also using a P5WD2 Dual core, with 6DSP+15DSP Scopes. I believe it's impossible to install windows in standard pc mode in multi-processor setups (at least it never worked here), and I also had to disable the modem, Network card, onboard audio, etc. to get a nice stable scope performance, which I did, proving that dualcores can work well with scope.
BUT, I could never get more than 12MVs @ 44.1 KHz (21DSPs), and it never worked with samplerates above 48KHz (but my laptop does 96KHz easily with a Mamga PCMCIA expansion). I believe that this is because of the PCI-E bus, where the graphics board is... Maybe old-style AGP works better for old-style PCI?
I'm also using a P5WD2 Dual core, with 6DSP+15DSP Scopes. I believe it's impossible to install windows in standard pc mode in multi-processor setups (at least it never worked here), and I also had to disable the modem, Network card, onboard audio, etc. to get a nice stable scope performance, which I did, proving that dualcores can work well with scope.
BUT, I could never get more than 12MVs @ 44.1 KHz (21DSPs), and it never worked with samplerates above 48KHz (but my laptop does 96KHz easily with a Mamga PCMCIA expansion). I believe that this is because of the PCI-E bus, where the graphics board is... Maybe old-style AGP works better for old-style PCI?
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Hi Tau,
What latency are you running at? Did you get good audio performance with high CPU loads at, say, 2.9ms? What about when Scope devices -- reverbs, delays, and STS -- are loaded as well? It was when all this was put together that my AMD dualcore system sank more than singlecore.
Shayne
What latency are you running at? Did you get good audio performance with high CPU loads at, say, 2.9ms? What about when Scope devices -- reverbs, delays, and STS -- are loaded as well? It was when all this was put together that my AMD dualcore system sank more than singlecore.
Shayne
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com
Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
http://www.melodious-synth.com
Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
Hi Shayne,
I usually use sfp alongside Ableton Live, and so latency has to be a liitle high to process audio and fx in realtime, when using Scope drivers for both apps. On the Dual Core, I usually use 6-12ms latency @48Khz, but sometimes have to bring it up a little, when VST load i higher... My laptop also does 6-12 ms, but I haven't experimented with that for a while...
But when I use my RME soundcard for Ableton, leaving sfp running on its own (and routing audio into the RME), I can use lower latencies, without any problems.
The project I'm working on right now, as an example:
-Ableton CPU load (on RME): 30-70%
-SFP: ModIII with 3 voices, STS 5000 using 23MB of memory, STM1632 with one DelayS and an Masterverb Pro on the AUX channels, another DelayS on an insert, then some compressors, filters, modulators, (and my new spEQtrum) It's not a big project, but it's running very well with 3ms latency @48Khz.
Not really sure if this is what you're asking, though...
Cheers,
T
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Tau on 2006-07-21 09:59 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Tau on 2006-07-21 10:01 ]</font>
I usually use sfp alongside Ableton Live, and so latency has to be a liitle high to process audio and fx in realtime, when using Scope drivers for both apps. On the Dual Core, I usually use 6-12ms latency @48Khz, but sometimes have to bring it up a little, when VST load i higher... My laptop also does 6-12 ms, but I haven't experimented with that for a while...
But when I use my RME soundcard for Ableton, leaving sfp running on its own (and routing audio into the RME), I can use lower latencies, without any problems.
The project I'm working on right now, as an example:
-Ableton CPU load (on RME): 30-70%
-SFP: ModIII with 3 voices, STS 5000 using 23MB of memory, STM1632 with one DelayS and an Masterverb Pro on the AUX channels, another DelayS on an insert, then some compressors, filters, modulators, (and my new spEQtrum) It's not a big project, but it's running very well with 3ms latency @48Khz.
Not really sure if this is what you're asking, though...
Cheers,
T
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Tau on 2006-07-21 09:59 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Tau on 2006-07-21 10:01 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Q:How is the PCI-e graphics card on the new standard working 4 you? I just recieved my sample CPU, and am building a second SFP DAW w/ VST host. I always used the good old 2D Matrox cards, but I feel the Matrox P650 is a little overkill. My DAWMAN tells me a good 100 USD NVidia card will work fine, what say you. I was thinking of the eVGA GeForce 7300GT 16x PCI-e.
A: Hi Jimmy,
Yes, your dawman is right. A simple 50 euro Nvidia card is fine and this way you don't need an oversized powersupply. My setup runs with a 330watts Anatek Truepower PSU.
Nice to hear you like the picture. My 8 year old son made it. I will tell him. Did you listen to the music as well?
Regards,
Marc
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-14 05:38 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-14 05:39 ]</font>
A: Hi Jimmy,
Yes, your dawman is right. A simple 50 euro Nvidia card is fine and this way you don't need an oversized powersupply. My setup runs with a 330watts Anatek Truepower PSU.
Nice to hear you like the picture. My 8 year old son made it. I will tell him. Did you listen to the music as well?
Regards,
Marc
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-14 05:38 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-14 05:39 ]</font>
MDR,
My cards are always maxed out, but will definately give it a listen, as Upright Bass is such an awesome instrument. I've had the pleasure to listen to many jazz artists where I grew up. Always loved a well mic'd Upright played by a musician with great intonation.
I found a brand new eVGA GeForce 6800 w/ 256 MB RAM on board 4 close to price you mentioned. I will be posting on sucsess/failures of a Core 2 Duo DAW 2nd week of September.
_________________
Jimmy V.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: scope4live on 2006-08-08 15:50 ]</font>
My cards are always maxed out, but will definately give it a listen, as Upright Bass is such an awesome instrument. I've had the pleasure to listen to many jazz artists where I grew up. Always loved a well mic'd Upright played by a musician with great intonation.
I found a brand new eVGA GeForce 6800 w/ 256 MB RAM on board 4 close to price you mentioned. I will be posting on sucsess/failures of a Core 2 Duo DAW 2nd week of September.
_________________
Jimmy V.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: scope4live on 2006-08-08 15:50 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Hi Okantah,
I don't use STS. I'm working in XTC mode and use Kontakt2 and Intakt. I managed to make an attracktive crossgrade from STS3000 to Kontakt. IMHO it makes more sense to have a sampler as a real VST instrument, because in that way it puts less strain on the PCI bus, which is still an issue when the DSP chips are almost filled to the max. (STS is loaded in DSP and manages RAM on the mobo via PCI).
Hi Shayne White
-like I said earlier in this thread, I'm working @4ms 44.1K which is OK for XTC. I guess in normal Scope mode you could go to smaller latencies. But 4ms is fine to me. Even when playing Edrums, playback feels natural to me. When I was @7ms with my former setup (P4b533-2.4GHz) it wasn't. I had to wait for the sound to be produced.
-Reverbs and delays are working fine here, but beware if you are almost at the limit of the DSP usage performance drops dramaticly. I guess there is some more DSP needed to synchronize to the faster internal clock.
Regards,
Marc
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-24 03:44 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-24 06:40 ]</font>
I don't use STS. I'm working in XTC mode and use Kontakt2 and Intakt. I managed to make an attracktive crossgrade from STS3000 to Kontakt. IMHO it makes more sense to have a sampler as a real VST instrument, because in that way it puts less strain on the PCI bus, which is still an issue when the DSP chips are almost filled to the max. (STS is loaded in DSP and manages RAM on the mobo via PCI).
Hi Shayne White
-like I said earlier in this thread, I'm working @4ms 44.1K which is OK for XTC. I guess in normal Scope mode you could go to smaller latencies. But 4ms is fine to me. Even when playing Edrums, playback feels natural to me. When I was @7ms with my former setup (P4b533-2.4GHz) it wasn't. I had to wait for the sound to be produced.
-Reverbs and delays are working fine here, but beware if you are almost at the limit of the DSP usage performance drops dramaticly. I guess there is some more DSP needed to synchronize to the faster internal clock.
Regards,
Marc
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-24 03:44 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marc de Ruiter on 2006-08-24 06:40 ]</font>