What devices used PC memory?
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Spain
I´m using now a 3 dsp card with a Magma CB2 and a laptop IBM T40.
I have in mind the posibility of get a 6 or 15 dsp card, knowing that the cardbus have a limited bandwith.
I have asked this before, but I would like to be more specific.
I only use one device at time, and use SX as a audio tape recorder, so don´t record midi tracks.
The reason I would like to get more dsp, is to can have all devices needed loaded on the proyect, to can change quickly the instrument to play, without have to load a proyect each time, as I have to do with the 3 dsp card.
I know STS sampler uses PC memory, and so need bandwith what can solution it setting the number of voices to 0 when not use it.
Also the reverb requires bandwith, but I don´t use at all.
What about other devices, like B-2003? Dynatube? Synths?
B-2003 have fixed the number of voices, but, does it require bandwith?
What about Dynatube?
I have in mind the posibility of get a 6 or 15 dsp card, knowing that the cardbus have a limited bandwith.
I have asked this before, but I would like to be more specific.
I only use one device at time, and use SX as a audio tape recorder, so don´t record midi tracks.
The reason I would like to get more dsp, is to can have all devices needed loaded on the proyect, to can change quickly the instrument to play, without have to load a proyect each time, as I have to do with the 3 dsp card.
I know STS sampler uses PC memory, and so need bandwith what can solution it setting the number of voices to 0 when not use it.
Also the reverb requires bandwith, but I don´t use at all.
What about other devices, like B-2003? Dynatube? Synths?
B-2003 have fixed the number of voices, but, does it require bandwith?
What about Dynatube?
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Spain
Does it mean that depending on the device loaded, it will require or not system memory?On 2006-09-10 11:38, stardust wrote:
...when going beyond the sample memory available onboard. In SDK the modules onboard memory ends around 3000 samples
What do you think about B2003, and dynatube? have they enough onboard memory?
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: JRR Shop
- Contact:
The STS's & delays don't really create much of a bandwidth issue, it's only the reverbs that hit the bus hard.On 2006-09-09 18:53, garyb wrote:
afaik, it's mainly sts, delays and reverbs that use system memory.
Uncle E
JRR Shop
TEL: 949-553-8898
FAX: 949-263-1818
http://www.jrrshop.com
http://www.justroots.com
JRR Shop
TEL: 949-553-8898
FAX: 949-263-1818
http://www.jrrshop.com
http://www.justroots.com
yes, the on-chip memory is more than enough for a couple of wave cycles - this is the advantage of real-time processingOn 2006-09-10 15:30, lagoausente wrote:
...What do you think about B2003, and dynatube? have they enough onboard memory?
... it's disadvantage is that you cannot do a simple off-line rendering of an audio file, but one cannot have all

cheers, Tom
true, but with 'big' reverbs loaded, even those simple dealys don't get their slice of time and the device load may fail - at least on older cards than the Pulsar 2.On 2006-09-10 16:42, Eric Dahlberg wrote:
...The STS's & delays don't really create much of a bandwidth issue, it's only the reverbs that hit the bus hard.
cheers, Tom
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Spain
Thanks, that sounds good since I don´t use reverb on Scope at all, instead use it on SX.
Seems that I could go ok with my setup. Just one question. If I get a 15 dsp card, I asume I will can use all pluings I have on the 3 dsp one. But, probably I would like to remove the 3 dsp one from the Magma, because probably with the 2 cards could have less bandwith performance. In this case, would allow the all.key file work with the plugins I got for the 3 dsp, on the 15 one, but without the 3 dsp placed in the system?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: lagoausente on 2006-09-11 12:49 ]</font>
Seems that I could go ok with my setup. Just one question. If I get a 15 dsp card, I asume I will can use all pluings I have on the 3 dsp one. But, probably I would like to remove the 3 dsp one from the Magma, because probably with the 2 cards could have less bandwith performance. In this case, would allow the all.key file work with the plugins I got for the 3 dsp, on the 15 one, but without the 3 dsp placed in the system?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: lagoausente on 2006-09-11 12:49 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: JRR Shop
- Contact:
Tom is correct. FYI, if you do decide to remove the 3 chip card, you'll need to have your plug-ins transferred by Creamware. There is a plug-in transfer fee, though it is not so bad when you're doing them all at once (one-by-one is pretty pricey, unfortunately).
Uncle E
JRR Shop
TEL: 949-553-8898
FAX: 949-263-1818
http://www.jrrshop.com
http://www.justroots.com
JRR Shop
TEL: 949-553-8898
FAX: 949-263-1818
http://www.jrrshop.com
http://www.justroots.com
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Spain
I supply my Magma with 12V. When empty, it consumes a few mA, when put the 3 dsp card, it consumes 0.5 amp.
I´m guessing how much would consume one 15 dsp? also 0.5 amp? o maybe the consumtion have relation with the number of dsp?
If the 15 dsp consume also 0.5 amp, maybe I would like to remove the 3 dsp one, just for more autonomy.
I thought that having the two cards registered, would have keyfilles for both.
I´m guessing how much would consume one 15 dsp? also 0.5 amp? o maybe the consumtion have relation with the number of dsp?
If the 15 dsp consume also 0.5 amp, maybe I would like to remove the 3 dsp one, just for more autonomy.
I thought that having the two cards registered, would have keyfilles for both.
well, 2 watt per DSP isn't mindblowing, a pentium uses 10-20 times as much (afaik).
I have a 12V 4A PSU (size of a cigarette box) for my mini itx that feeds an additional regulation board for 12, 5 and 3.3 V and the complete set was less than 50 Euro if I remember right.
Those modern regulators are magnitudes more effective than the 'classical' PSU design, that means they produce almost no additional heat.
cheers, tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-09-13 12:21 ]</font>
I have a 12V 4A PSU (size of a cigarette box) for my mini itx that feeds an additional regulation board for 12, 5 and 3.3 V and the complete set was less than 50 Euro if I remember right.
Those modern regulators are magnitudes more effective than the 'classical' PSU design, that means they produce almost no additional heat.
cheers, tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-09-13 12:21 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Spain
Probably is the same I´m using. Mine is Pico PSU, I would say it´s even smaller than a cigarrette box. I forget to say it. I have replaced the original power supply from the Magma CB2, and put the Pico PSU instead, that have been working perfectly.On 2006-09-13 12:20, astroman wrote:
well, 2 watt per DSP isn't mindblowing, a pentium uses 10-20 times as much (afaik).
I have a 12V 4A PSU (size of a cigarette box) for my mini itx that feeds an additional regulation board for 12, 5 and 3.3 V and the complete set was less than 50 Euro if I remember right.
Those modern regulators are magnitudes more effective than the 'classical' PSU design, that means they produce almost no additional heat.
cheers, tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-09-13 12:21 ]</font>
I´m not saying that is much consum for each dsp, only have the doubt if the consum depends on the number of dsp, or not. The pci needs a amperage, my doubt is how much of this 0.5 amp are consumed by the dsp. If you have a 15 dsp card, could do a sigle measure, with and whitout the card.
It can be 5x 0.5 amp, so 2.5 amp
or maybe near the same as the 3 dsp one, let´s say for example, 0.8 amp, depending if the overall amperage is used by the dsp themselves or not.