DigitalAudioSoft - EQ Suite

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
katano
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Post by katano »

Hi all

First, I don't want to join each of the two sides, i'm swiss, i'm neutral :grin: Nevertheless i'd like to see some positiv conclusions going on here, else it's useless at least for me...

Ok, let's start. Just wanted to bring in a new point in this discussion. All posts are based on phase, phase shifting, phase polarity etc...

So what the hell are all these things exactly?! I think the problem is that we are talking about different things here. I'm not that good in all that phase stuff, it's way beyond my knowledge, so now it's time for the Pros to explain what we are talking about here!!

Ok, did some research and I found some nice explanations about phase in another forum, see here:


<i><b>What you do with phase on a computer</b>

Let's say you've got your sine wave file. Looks something like this:
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... nphase.gif">
This would be like how the waveform displays in an audio editor. It puts each sample on the graph, depending on sample time (x axis) and sample volume/intensity (y axis). Notably, the y axis can be positive or negative (meaning "compressing" or "decompressing" the air relative to normal atmostpheric pressure--but I said we weren't going to get into that).
Positive y = Positive analog voltage = Speaker Moving Outward = Compression,
Negative y = Negative analog voltage = Speaker Moving Inward/Backward = Decompression

Now let's look at a different sine wave file.
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... eshift.gif">
It looks just about the same. For most purposes, it is the same. One minor exception seems to be the initial delay. It's not really delay, it's "Phase Angle". Since the Sine function relates to the Phase Angle of a circle, where you start on the circle determines what the given intensity is at that point in time. This one is out-of-phase with the first one by a small amount.

Look what happens when you superimpose to two:
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... sesine.gif">
This more clearly shows the relationship between the 2.

However, when mixed (digitally, electronically, or aurally), they combine to show a new wave that is the vector addition of the 2 waves:
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... esine2.gif">
Because of the vector addition (which incorporates the phase angle) and because of the fact of having the possibility of Positive and Negative intensities, weird things can start to happen (called interference)...

If they are identical in phase (basically just 2 copies of the same file), they have constructive interference and add together to be twice as loud.:
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... sesine.gif">

If they are completely opposite in phase (i.e. "Reverse Polarity" or "Inverted"),
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... tphase.gif">
then together they have destructive interference and subtract, creating a total wave of ZERO or complete silence.:
<IMG SRC="http://forum.videohelp.com/images/guide ... sesine.gif">

<b>--- sidenote from katano: this is what martin tried to reach, isn't it?</b>

Of course, realworld signals have multiple frequencies and harmonics and vary their levels, so nothing is so cut & dried, it's much more complex than that.

Phase inversion/shifting allows you to do the complex mixing required so that you can add (matrix) files together at one stage, and (nearly completely) recover the original files at a later stage (decoding). Dolby Surround/PL/PLII is based on this priciple of 4:2:4 matrixing.
There are other psychoacoustic uses for phase adjustment as well. </i>

that's all folks...
greez
roman


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: katano on 2006-09-25 05:39 ]</font>
hubird

Post by hubird »

On 2006-09-25 05:35, katano wrote:
this is what martin tried to reach, isn't it?
yes :smile:
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

---
Last edited by MCCY on Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gordon Gekko
Posts: 1104
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: paname

Post by Gordon Gekko »

guys, you are getting too technical. I don't think eric the dick can fully grasp the complexity and implications of these scientific explainations. please be gentle with this poor young lad
User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

theres so much namecalling by people with nothing to say. im shocked.

to ALL of you (even legros and hifiboom). I understand you have a disagreement, but please stop the shit you are throwing, it doesnt help anyone.
User avatar
Gordon Gekko
Posts: 1104
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: paname

Post by Gordon Gekko »

ya know it's like going to the can, when you gotta go, you gotta go :lol:

hey piddi, no big deal here. sometimes you guys get too much sensible i think. But i understand and i'll stop because i respect you and all planetzers... But you can be sure i'll be right up there if einstein starts to insult people again

peace
musurgio
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by musurgio »

Hey you guys.
I have read all the posts.
What really makes DAS eqs different is not how similar CW eqs can sound identical but also how DAS eqs react when there is a complex sound like a mix or drumloop and sound can get big without easy hearable distortion. Even Graphic eq can sound close some times but the sound on DA eqs is more defined and sounding more like hardware !
I don't care what atoms have been used I care how the actual sound comes out.
Graphic eq was nice at the very beginning but actual sound was not in the end totally satisfying.
Maybe DAS uses some kind of hidden limiting inside eqs but if so that would be just clever, right ?
What would we do take a couple of CW eq's CW limiter and maybe vinco to make identical results ?
The fact is ONE.
Do you like whats you hear ?
Do you prefer it over other ?
Thats the point.
I don't care if Eric got carried away and showed himself human as we all are so many times.
I care about the plugz and not about the character of the developer which can be forgiven if he is a good developer.
We must also show appreciation that some folks are trying to amke plugins for scope which might be close to become vintage...
They and others of course are keeping this alive.
Try them and if you don't like them don't buy them and if you do buy.
I wish I had some extra money now for I would buy them all !!
It has been a long time since I enjoyed new plugins for scope.
Regards,
Dimitrios
hubird

Post by hubird »

I've seen a young software company just throwing away possibly 10.000,- euro in one night Image
Just by using the wrong words and attitude on an internet forum.
It shows that being a developer is something different from being an entrepeneur.
If this thread would be part of an management education book, the reader would think, na what an irrealistic example of entrepeneurship, it doesn't happen this way.
But it does happen, right here, and it got funny indeed, haha, a novel writer couldn't it imagine this way Image
Satosh
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by Satosh »

On 2006-09-25 01:22, legros wrote:
maybe i'm einstein but you,who are you ? another stupid member ?you are 5 now on pz ! nice you come here without testing and reading and you write s..t post on me !
nah, it's like this: i'm another stupid potential customer that you just lost.. and i suspect we are not only five in here :lol:
Your suspicions are right.
hubird

Post by hubird »

On 2006-09-25 07:35, musurgio wrote:
What really makes DAS eqs different is not how similar CW eqs can sound identical but also how DAS eqs react when there is a complex sound like a mix or drumloop and sound can get big without easy hearable distortion.
I used a complex mix when I did the cancelation test :smile:

Eric started talking about some mysterious 'color' of the sound, sonolive about the difference between 'level' and 'phase', and you (no offend :smile: ) name the way the internal circuits 'react'.

However, at the end of the gate there's always that 100 % cancelation...
With both files having exactly the same 'distortion', 'level', 'phase', processing reaction...name it.
Both files totally identical...totally :smile:


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2006-09-25 08:04 ]</font>
hubird

Post by hubird »

On 2006-09-25 07:12, piddi wrote:
theres so much namecalling by people with nothing to say. im shocked.
Does that shock you?
I was shocked to see a company behave like DAS Image

As a professional commercial operating company DAS should behave like a (welcome) guest in our (John's) consumer community, not as a jerky site owner, haha.
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

There really is no difference between white noise and the sound from a big arrangement, when doing a chanceling test. If it chancels out at 0dB and silence, it is acoustically the same. And so its the same result....

Its a big mistake to think there would be a difference.

Actually that little distortion that is occuring with DAS EQs is not a feature but a bug...Okay it may sound good at some time.

Their indicator LED for clipping does not work properly....It sometimes clips although clip LED is off. Same with RMX reverb.
DAS know this but are not able to fix these problems. So they go on telling you have to undertsand what 0dBfs is.... and things like this..

That may be due to the fact that they are not able to program real code, but just adding some atoms in a line.
I am able to talk with "real developers", and I have some coding skills and a job in this buisness, although not in audio department.

So don talk too much shit, Eric you self-appointed "real pro developer".

You may blend some users, that don`t exactly undersatnd what bs you are talking.
User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

i think i just added the "im shocked" bit to add some drama, as i am not shocked at all
sonolive
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Digital AudioSoft
Contact:

Post by sonolive »

at this point of the thread, i've got that strange feeling that i would prefer to continue this discussion "face to face" i mean phisically, speaking instead of writing, in the real world instead of via this virtual reality web is, and i am sure some of you should be much less courageous in theis words an sentences than via this forum !!!

but it's not to late ...
I am PAILLER Olivier, live in france - britain at :
11 cité jean jaures
56 570 LOCMIQUELIC,

and as i travel a lot, and we could meet,
any of these fantastic developpers, users, musicians and so on want to give his name and adress (why not) instead of anonymous insults and provocations ?

hifiboom , no need to answer this fantastic post !!!

cheers,
olive
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

---
Last edited by MCCY on Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

On 2006-09-25 10:03, sonolive wrote:
at this point of the thread, i've got that strange feeling that i would prefer to continue this discussion "face to face" i mean phisically, speaking instead of writing, in the real world instead of via this virtual reality web is, and i am sure some of you should be much less courageous in theis words an sentences than via this forum !!!

but it's not to late ...
I am PAILLER Olivier, live in france - britain at :
11 cité jean jaures
56 570 LOCMIQUELIC,

and as i travel a lot, and we could meet,
any of these fantastic developpers, users, musicians and so on want to give his name and adress (why not) instead of anonymous insults and provocations ?

hifiboom , no need to answer this fantastic post !!!

cheers,
olive
sorry but I am not interested to meet any of you.
sonolive
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Digital AudioSoft
Contact:

Post by sonolive »

On 2006-09-25 10:19, MCCYRANO wrote:
I would not give you my adress because of your agressive tone and insulting. I fear your "physical arguments"
???
oh i see "physically" scares you !!!
sorry but it's the only trnslation a found for "meeting directly" is there another word in english ??? tell me i'll edit my post !

is my post insulting and insulting and agressive ?

i told you speaking instead of writing, "face to face" !

introducing oneself instead of anonymous insult !
is it not clear ?
cheers
olive
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

---
Last edited by MCCY on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gordon Gekko
Posts: 1104
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: paname

Post by Gordon Gekko »

olive, your post could've been interpreted as agressive yes. I have no problem meeting with you in real life, but i won't leave my address here, pm me and we can go and meet sometime. I prefer this approach than being called stupid over an internet forum too

peace
sonolive
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Digital AudioSoft
Contact:

Post by sonolive »

On 2006-09-25 10:50, legros wrote:
your post could've been interpreted as agressive
so it COULD have been interpreted as agressive !!! and i COULD have been a martian and you COULDcould have been a chinese and our plugs COULD have been bugged and this post COULD have been virtual and my sister COULD have been my brother ! but not
i am olive
and you! who are you ?
in this world not in this COULD have been world !!!
cheers
olive
Post Reply