na, the argumentation is only valid if you agree on comparing Trump and Clinton to Hitler and Stalin - which is rather ridiculous in the eyes of millions of people.
The people were able to chose for Sanders or Paul in example, but...they didn't
I might find that a pity, but...they didn't.
Larken Rose sees himself alienated so much from the society he lives in and prosperously survives in, that he rejects it totally, as it seems.
He's a fundamentalist, and doesn't offer any relevant alternative. Negative shit, so to say.
Yet, most voters think differently about it, and they are not stupid, let alone mislead...
Both candidates get a serious part of their votes from voters with a negative motivation: they don't wanne get the other candidate elected.
That is because these voters see important differences between both candidates, worth to vote for or against.
If Hillary wins I'm not really glad but I will feel quite relieved to see Trump lose.
A lot of immaterial values will be better off with her, and if she holds word to the voters for Sanders the minimum wage are uplifted too, for instance.
But in a polarised world there's only black and white I'm afraid...
I never feel challenged by those black and white thinkers, they look simple to me...