Connecting a Pular I to a Pulsar II

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
dayv
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by dayv »

Sorry, I'm sure this may have been asked before, but I had no luck with the search.

I recently purchased a A16 Ultra, as I wanted to run heaps of inputs into the computer and monitor from within Cubase (I'm currently running a Pulsar I). Since I can only get 13ms latency (does that work out as 2x13ms in round trip?), I've found that monitoring inputs from within Cubase introduces a very noticable latency to the outboard gear! I don't want to monitor in pulsar, as I want to be able to use DX and VST plugs over my outboard gear.

Would buying a pulsar II stop this latency issue by utilizing ULLI, as could I connect it up to my Pulsar I with no problems, still using both sets of DSPs? What would the latency be of such a setup?

Thanks for any advice!
Davey.
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

To cut a long story short: YES :smile:

If you have 2 different generation cards the system switches to the newer one :smile: Many of us have a similar system to yours (mine is Luna II and Pulsar 1). I have 4ms @ 44.1kHz (I'm on a Mac).

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2003-08-23 13:16 ]</font>
DigiSUN
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by DigiSUN »

I have Pulsar I + Pulsar II on a PC and it works great.
The SFP software automatically assigns the newer board as primary, and loads the ASIO and wave drivers into its DSPs, hence utilizing all the low-latency advantage of new-generation boards. the older Pulsar I becomes secondary and serves as an I/O board and DSP expansion.
If there's any problem with automatic assignment of board ID's (unlikely), it's also possible to do it manually (INI file configuration).
Just don't forget to ask your dealer for a S/TDM cable to connect the 2 boards. A Pulsar II has 2 connections for a S/TDM cable. If you encounter any problems, try to use a different connection.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DigiSUN on 2003-08-24 13:27 ]</font>
fidox
Posts: 837
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Slovenia
Contact:

Post by fidox »

hi there,


soon i'll have 2 luna II cards connected, i'm waiting just for S/TDM cable now,
if I understand right, i can connect with Pulsar II also both luna II cards ?
that would be very awsome,
did you expect any problems installing 2 luna II cards ?
i hope it works fine, with no complications

have all nice time

bye
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

should all be cool!
dayv
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by dayv »

Thanks for the info guys, all sounds good!
Will I have any noticable latency if I monitor the inputs in Cubase using the 4ms setting?
Chrz,
Davey.
User avatar
paulrmartin
Posts: 2445
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by paulrmartin »

On 2003-08-24 13:26, DigiSUN wrote:

The SFP software automatically assigns the newer board as primary, and loads the ASIO and wave drivers into its DSPs, hence utilizing all the low-latency advantage of new-generation boards. the older Pulsar I becomes secondary and serves as an I/O board and DSP expansion.
Does this mean that I should connect my external stuff to the older card, like my optical cables and my ADAT connections?

Also, how can I tell which card is older?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: paulrmartin on 2003-08-26 21:39 ]</font>
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

a 4ms,there should be no problem unless you are very sensitive.
Post Reply