NI-Battery vs Pulsar

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
QA
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by QA »

Hi there.
I'am pulsar user and my sequencer is cubase vst5.0, I discovered that my beats (made with pulsardevices) where out of synch, they weren't thight enough. Now I Discovered a VST program called Native Instruments Battery, when i make a beat with this program, the beats are thight like on a AKAI MPC2000XL. Even when i record the beat to audio the beat stays tight. I have only one problem, the sounds i make with pulsar (for example a bass) seems to be out of synch with beat. does anybody experience the same problem, and does somebody know the solution.

TIA QA
Rene
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Rene »

Moin,

I am using the same stuff and have the same problem! Yesterday I put the ULLI settings from 25 ms to 13 ms and it seems (I am not quite sure) that it is more tight now! But it is hard to judge just by your ear if it sounds different! Just try to change the ULLI settings!
I am thankful for other advices as well!!
subhuman
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Galaxy Inside

Post by subhuman »

What you're experiencing is the ASIO driver latency, and the amazing zero-latency environment of Pulsar.

Anything INSIDE Pulsar like synths, samplers, etc will literally have 0-2ms latency or so, just like a hardware synth. Timing is rock solid tight "like an MPC2000."

When you run a VST instrument like NI Battery, it connects to your audio card through a windows ASIO driver. Pulsar has pretty good ASIO drivers (7ms or lower with make2 cards, 13ms with make1 cards), so setting your ULLI to 13ms will help this driver delay. The delay is caused by windows stealing cycles, and the only way to fix it is to build a hardware buffer into your soundcard like creamware has (but you still get latency since windows was never supposed to be a 'realtime os.')

YOu can also adjust your Sequencer to play back Audio/ASIO/VST by setting an offset of your ULLI. If you have your ULLI set to 13ms, then offset should be -13ms. Look in your manual for more information, it explains it pretty well. Also the Pulsar manual has a few words to get you on the right track too.
PabloFasan
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by PabloFasan »

Sorry for introduce my spoon in this talk.

Really the difference between 25 ms or 13 ms is non-audible.

If you percieve with your ears a noticiable latency, and more if you'r speaking about bass frecuencies, the amount of latency probably is over of 1/10 second or more.

Psicoacustically speaking, the time that the brain need for to react and recognize bass frcuencies is to much longer than with the center or high frecuencies.

The overtones help a little, but only in sounds that have a very pecussive attack, if not the accuracity of the sound attack is a relative concept.

To have a sound + 20 or -20 ms before or after the quantization value is heard like a groove sensation (the "old" word swing used in jazz is apropiate for this).

To see a sound in an editor screen out of phase or without coincidence in the attack with others, does not mean an error and many times a is musical decision.

In real acoustic instruments music, to have a 1/10 second "sync" precision, is to have a good timming and if your precision playing is near 1/20 second you'r a master of rhythm.
Michaelj
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Michaelj »

Maybe this is important.If you wanna play the pulsar projekt Live I guess 7 ms
latency gives you the real feeling !!!.

But I saw that Cubase VST 5
has a latency about 28 ms (Mac).
So if the ulli setting in pulsar is set to
25. it would be "more" tight.

and I gusee that you in cubase can set Audio to midi timing -3 or + 3 ms
to get that exact feeling.

ok ok..we need to make music and in ordinary played music , we NEVER hear so small differences.
But if you have a drumloop that goes round and around, it goes a little out of sync if theere is a difference.
Music and Video is what I do
Michaelj
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Michaelj »

Important. I just said 28 ms in Cubase.
that can be another value with other asio.

so a latency of say 15ms in cubase.
Then it would be as close to that in the ulli
settings in Pulsar.


or ??
jupiter8
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden lives in Norway

Post by jupiter8 »

I run a Mac G4 with 4 ms latency. For comparison the Waldorf Q has 7 ms. So 25 ms is really unnecessary. Change ULLI setting to 4 ms. With the latest upgrade you can even run on the lowest ULLI setting. There is no reason to accept 25 ms latency.
User avatar
Neutron
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Great white north eh
Contact:

Post by Neutron »

Are you using windows or MAC? if you are using windows, it could be a problem with your MIDI setup.

1:make sure you do not have MIDI yoke or Hubis loopback installed
2: use winME for better midi timing (you have to diasable a lot of crap in ME to make it any good though)
Post Reply