master-d beta 1.7

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .mdl"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: Effect<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Requires: sfp 3.1<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> <b>master d</b> - multiband mastering compressor
beta <b>1.7</b>

<b>features:</b>
<ul>
<li>3 band compression</li>
<li>3 band softclip</li>
<li>phase coherent </li>
<li>build in look ahead detection</li>
<li>easy to use</li>
<li>bass delay</li>
</ul>
<b>known bugs:</b>
<ul>
<li>presetlist not working</li>
<li>dsp error @ 96 kHz (algorythm is too big for a single dsp)</li>
</ul>
...any suggestion is welcome :wink:

best,
andre


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-27 19:20 ]</font><BR><BR><a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... bt_1_7.jpg" BORDER="0">
User avatar
cannonball
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: italia

Post by cannonball »

hi

thanks i'll try

sometime ago i've seen here a device called
psybass just for few hour there's a way to try or in alpha beta stage?

alessandro
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

hi,
the "bass" algorythm will be included in master-d in an upcoming release.

best,
andre
scary808
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Utah

Post by scary808 »

Thanks! I'm near the mastering stage of my new track so I'll give it a try.


P.S. I happen to like the current GUI. The clear, laid out, easy to read, "generic SFP look" shouts legitimacy.
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

For some reason I get a DSP overload ("Big modules do not fit") message when trying to load this device. Strange error considering I have about 95% of my DSP load remaining. lol

Anyone else experience this?
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

I have no probs loading it - Mac Pulsar1/LunaII.

Andre, I've got a question on using it:
- what is the neutral freq adjust position? I've tried some and haven't found.

Yes, the gui is clear like a baby's chick :wink:

Thank you :smile:

_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-02-13 08:00 ]</font>
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

On 2004-02-13 07:40, deejaysly wrote:
For some reason I get a DSP overload ("Big modules do not fit") message when trying to load this device. Strange error considering I have about 95% of my DSP load remaining. lol

Anyone else experience this?
the whole algorythm is calculated on a single dsp to avoid phase problems.
what board and what kind of software are you using?

best,
andre
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

On 2004-02-13 07:59, samplaire wrote:
I have no probs loading it - Mac Pulsar1/LunaII.

Andre, I've got a question on using it:
- what is the neutral freq adjust position? I've tried some and haven't found.

Yes, the gui is clear like a baby's chick :wink:

Thank you :smile:

_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-02-13 08:00 ]</font>
hi,
you get a neutral frequency when all 3 bands are set to the same level. (doubleclick) AND if there is no compression.
if you compress the signal, you have to adjust them manuelly...

best,
andre
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

That was so obvious! :smile:

Thanks!
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

Andre,

I've figured it out.

It don't like 48kHz sample rate.

Changed to 44.1 and it loaded fine.

Regards.
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

thank you deejaysly!
..so I have to spread the algorythms over more dsps..

best,
andre
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

...updated (1.4)!

48 khz bug fixed, features added and still free :wink:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-15 16:39 ]</font>
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

...updated (beta 1.5)

-output gain fixed (-0,3 db)
Stige
Posts: 260
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Finland

Post by Stige »

How about a mono version of this device. It sounds nice and 'vintage' with vocals :wink:Getting better.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-02-16 19:55 ]</font>
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

On 2004-02-16 19:55, Stige wrote:
How about a mono version of this device. It sounds nice and 'vintage' with vocals :wink:Getting better.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-02-16 19:55 ]</font>
good idea :wink:

best,
andre
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

Hi!
I'm very impressed. Sounds, as it is really phase coherent - I thought this is a difficult thing for multibands! Nice work.

I like it's surface very much, but what about a box which opens seperately, where you can adjust some other values: Frequency for each band etc.

The softclipping is a bit agressive for my taste. (When I use it for mastering, there is a very small point in the values which makes the right amount - and then a second later it overdrives the signal totally. Difficult to adjust.)I'd like to disable it. I find it very difficult to find values which don't distort too much.

But WOW!!!!! Very nice from you, to let us test the betas for free!!!!

Thanks

Martin
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

On 2004-02-19 05:56, MCCYRANO wrote:
Hi!
I'm very impressed. Sounds, as it is really phase coherent - I thought this is a difficult thing for multibands! Nice work.

I like it's surface very much, but what about a box which opens seperately, where you can adjust some other values: Frequency for each band etc.

The softclipping is a bit agressive for my taste. (When I use it for mastering, there is a very small point in the values which makes the right amount - and then a second later it overdrives the signal totally. Difficult to adjust.)I'd like to disable it. I find it very difficult to find values which don't distort too much.

But WOW!!!!! Very nice from you, to let us test the betas for free!!!!

Thanks

Martin
...the release will be for free too :wink:
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

Thanks Andre :cool:
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

On 2004-02-19 06:46, Andre Dupke wrote:
...the release will be for free too :wink:
Even better :grin:
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

uff. das ist klasse!

Oh, I didn't realize that the final will be free too!!! Wow!!!

What about putting the softclippings in inerts!? So one could decide whatever to put in the 3 inserts for each band...

Oh, what about just the frequency splitter with 3 inserts!!!! One could even put Timeworks comp X in it for compression...

Martin
Post Reply