Samplitude - So who is using this app and whats your thought
- siriusbliss
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Cupertino, California US
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Contact:
I've used v7.0 a bit.
Why I went for Samplitude and not for Cubase SX was really because of user interface, and because I think Steinberg is upgrade-happy and money-grubbing. I mean, come on. As a past Steinberg user I have absolutely zero respect for them as a company in terms of upgrades, and in terms of producing stable software wrt Cubase. I have always thought that WaveLab was excellent for 2-channel work though. Just never like Cubase or the way they have marketted it.
Now as for features, Samplitude had plugin-delay-compensation *BEFORE* Cubase did. And that is a very, very cool feature.
And really, beyond all of this... in virtually every case when I have dealt with a new piece of sound hardware, I have almost instantly been able to get things to work in Samplitude, and almost never been able to get them work in Cubase. No lie. The ASIO and the bit settings and so forth in Samplitude, clearly defined, and they work.
I kind of wish they had more market penetration. But either way. They have a good product and I hope they keep supporting it.
MIDI features and things like drum maps have been the key features that had me using Cubase before. But I really am more interested in audio than I am in MIDI, though I understand where some people would be heavy MIDI users. For recording/mastering, I just find Samplitude easier to use.
Why I went for Samplitude and not for Cubase SX was really because of user interface, and because I think Steinberg is upgrade-happy and money-grubbing. I mean, come on. As a past Steinberg user I have absolutely zero respect for them as a company in terms of upgrades, and in terms of producing stable software wrt Cubase. I have always thought that WaveLab was excellent for 2-channel work though. Just never like Cubase or the way they have marketted it.
Now as for features, Samplitude had plugin-delay-compensation *BEFORE* Cubase did. And that is a very, very cool feature.
And really, beyond all of this... in virtually every case when I have dealt with a new piece of sound hardware, I have almost instantly been able to get things to work in Samplitude, and almost never been able to get them work in Cubase. No lie. The ASIO and the bit settings and so forth in Samplitude, clearly defined, and they work.
I kind of wish they had more market penetration. But either way. They have a good product and I hope they keep supporting it.
MIDI features and things like drum maps have been the key features that had me using Cubase before. But I really am more interested in audio than I am in MIDI, though I understand where some people would be heavy MIDI users. For recording/mastering, I just find Samplitude easier to use.
- siriusbliss
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Cupertino, California US
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 4:00 pm
BTW,
Samplitude.com now has the V8 infocenter up and for those who are interested samplitude.de has german movies up, I cant understand a word they are saying the the new drum editor looks very slick aswell as there analog model suit.
Also they are showing the crossgrade to be US $599.00 for comprable software, not spectacular but not horrible I guess, Ill wait till they have a demo to see how the title has evolved on the composition front.
Cheers!
Samplitude.com now has the V8 infocenter up and for those who are interested samplitude.de has german movies up, I cant understand a word they are saying the the new drum editor looks very slick aswell as there analog model suit.
Also they are showing the crossgrade to be US $599.00 for comprable software, not spectacular but not horrible I guess, Ill wait till they have a demo to see how the title has evolved on the composition front.
Cheers!
I used the Noise Reduction "the right way" the other day. I was realy amazed at the good results. I just continued the recording for some time to get the room noise, and used that as the noise sample. I have only hi-fi speakers, but I must say that if it did mess with the sound - I couldn't hear it. I only heard my noisefloor drop. It is not that easy with a high noise floor, but like this it was realy good.
Information for new readers: A forum member named Braincell is known for spreading lies and malicious information without even knowing the basics of, what he is talking about. If noone responds to him, it is because he is ignored.
Samplitude sounds interesting , must check it out. Agreed about the Steinberg upgrade / company user-unfriendly policy . They were indifferent to their customers,in my experience,right from Commodore 64 /Cubase Audio Falcon days ....and they complain when people resort to the other "softwares" ....hmmm...nuff said. M
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Honestly from what I can see in the screenshots the midi doesn't look too far off from Sx. It might be lacking for the 'midi inserts' and a few other noncritical things, but otherwise it looks fairly similar (generic) even down to the multiple lanes of vertical bars. The only real question for me would be does it have a transform window of some sort?
Personally Logic's integration of plugin (track) automation, midi (hyper) automation and the ability to convert & manipulate it in logic is the real reason I haven't switched. If Samplitude had some way of treating midi objects in a simlar way to their audio objects (object editor with transforms etc) in a non-destructive manner, that could be quite cool.
Personally Logic's integration of plugin (track) automation, midi (hyper) automation and the ability to convert & manipulate it in logic is the real reason I haven't switched. If Samplitude had some way of treating midi objects in a simlar way to their audio objects (object editor with transforms etc) in a non-destructive manner, that could be quite cool.
- kensuguro
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
- Contact:
I want to ask the users of samplitude 7 tho... what's the MIDI implementation like at the moment? Does it look like they can get it right with ver 8? I downloaded an early demo of ver7 some time ago, but the MIDI implementation reeked, so I'm quite speculative as to how good it can get. (whether it can replace cubase or not) And also VSTi stability and compatibility.. in the infocenter, it says "number of VSTi (native single output)".. so what happens to stuff like Kontakt that has a bunch of outputs?
I love the way quantizing works in Logic, just maximum flexibility in all directions.. wonder if samplitude's will be all that good.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-08-22 02:35 ]</font>
I love the way quantizing works in Logic, just maximum flexibility in all directions.. wonder if samplitude's will be all that good.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-08-22 02:35 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 4:00 pm
Hi Ken,
Well I do not have v.8 of samp pro, but, I can say that after watching the german videos showing midi implementation it appears "vissually" that they have brought it pretty much on par with Cubase. The reason I say that is they sort of did a controler lane view for CC's and standard midi as Cubase offers editable with drawtools and such, lemme grab some links for you to check out, there are videos for a number of things, one very interesting one is the new "drum editior" this looks to be really well thought out and something ide like to get my hands on
Hrmm seems you cant link the direct page so here is how to get there!
http://www.samplitude.de then from there at the german site click on the right side of the page, the link named Samplitude v.8 Info Center.
From there each new feature has a cideo in multiple formats, be sure to check out the midi ones especially the drum editor, also check out the new elastic audio features, I heard its supposed to be like built in melodyne(sp?), also supposidly their convolution reverb and analog modeling suit is supposed to be top notch.
Enjoy!
Well I do not have v.8 of samp pro, but, I can say that after watching the german videos showing midi implementation it appears "vissually" that they have brought it pretty much on par with Cubase. The reason I say that is they sort of did a controler lane view for CC's and standard midi as Cubase offers editable with drawtools and such, lemme grab some links for you to check out, there are videos for a number of things, one very interesting one is the new "drum editior" this looks to be really well thought out and something ide like to get my hands on

Hrmm seems you cant link the direct page so here is how to get there!
http://www.samplitude.de then from there at the german site click on the right side of the page, the link named Samplitude v.8 Info Center.
From there each new feature has a cideo in multiple formats, be sure to check out the midi ones especially the drum editor, also check out the new elastic audio features, I heard its supposed to be like built in melodyne(sp?), also supposidly their convolution reverb and analog modeling suit is supposed to be top notch.
Enjoy!
Hi Alfonso,On 2004-08-22 18:39, alfonso wrote:
Does it record/open 32bit integer files or just 32bit f.p.?
As the Scope Platform works in 32 bit floating point, IEEE 32 bit floating point audio files is the accurate format to use, IMO.
The Scope synths audio files I record in Samplitude v7 are shown by the Samplitude's bitmeter to have a 30 bit linear/integer resolution. After processing these files with some Scope FXes, the new obtained resulting audio files are shown by the bitmeter to have a 32 bit floating point resolution.
BTW, the Samplitude v8's Analogue Modeling Suite got very, very good opinions from the german users of Samplitude that already have the v8 (to come in September for the english version).
It seems that I will be able to replace my Transient Designer (with wich I can get only 3 stereo instances in SFP, not more) with the Samplitude v8 own Transient Designer, in native. And with quicker-than-realtime bounces and freezes.
Some say it is worth waiting for the english v8 to come before buying an UAD card for UAD FXes.
For my understanding, Magix Elastic Audio is a substitute for Melodyne AND Autotune...
It seems that I will be able to replace my Transient Designer (with wich I can get only 3 stereo instances in SFP, not more) with the Samplitude v8 own Transient Designer, in native. And with quicker-than-realtime bounces and freezes.
Some say it is worth waiting for the english v8 to come before buying an UAD card for UAD FXes.
For my understanding, Magix Elastic Audio is a substitute for Melodyne AND Autotune...
Right now, I have only the v7.
As a user, I feel the v7 is top notch and unbeatable for audio works, and usable for MIDI (CC controllers drawable automations, tempo changes), even if not as discriminant as Logic is. If you are a quite good musical instruments player (I'm not), I think the Samplitude Professional v7 has the essential MIDI tools for you. Even if I'm not a good player, I can do what I want with the v7 MIDI functions.
I sure can't wait for using this Robota thing
and the Elastic Audio 
As a user, I feel the v7 is top notch and unbeatable for audio works, and usable for MIDI (CC controllers drawable automations, tempo changes), even if not as discriminant as Logic is. If you are a quite good musical instruments player (I'm not), I think the Samplitude Professional v7 has the essential MIDI tools for you. Even if I'm not a good player, I can do what I want with the v7 MIDI functions.
I sure can't wait for using this Robota thing

