FleXor future

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
spacef
Posts: 3334
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by spacef »

ReD_MuZe wrote:copy protection is over-rated.
and rise the price
User avatar
spacef
Posts: 3334
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by spacef »

stardust wrote:especially when dongles and their royalties are involved

which is why everyone should expect soon-cubase 5 to be much cheaper than cubase 4 :lol:
Last edited by spacef on Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
@plonter
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:43 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by @plonter »

Hi Happy New Year in Few Hours from Now :)

One more concern !!

i'm hopping to see is a big graphic, same Native Plugins and fx have small really small knob skin and overall that killing my eyes

for example "Arturia MoogModular" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/moogmodularv.jpg
or "Void" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/void.jpg

Asaf make it look "BIG" :o
User avatar
FrancisHarmany
Posts: 1078
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Haarmania

Re: FleXor future

Post by FrancisHarmany »

or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/... :D
User avatar
sonicstrav
Posts: 459
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:00 pm

Re: FleXor future

Post by sonicstrav »

Void looks horrible

Moog Modular V - I have this - sound quality hmmm........
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by ReD_MuZe »

flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem ;)
User avatar
capacitor
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:39 pm

Re: FleXor future

Post by capacitor »

Very cool! :o
The first action people should take is to remove cash from Banrural, and break the banks of corrupt people. #escandalogt
ironman
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:31 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by ironman »

flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD
If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??
@plonter
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:43 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by @plonter »

FrancisHarmany wrote:or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/... :D
ReD_MuZe wrote:flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem ;)

i get it Now

amazing :o
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by ReD_MuZe »

ironman wrote:
flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD
If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??
nop. math is math. the emulations sound bad for other reasons ;)

any emulation is doomed to sound worse than the original. especially ones that are originated in analog circuitry.

take virus for instance, the powecore version doesn't sound as good as the hardware version, yet they both use exactly the same dsp chip. why? optimization and marketing decisions i guess.

dsp has many other benefits: its much cheaper than cpu processors, its more stable, almost no latency, and it doesn't come with some cumbersome OS attached. if one wants to make computer detached hardware - dsp is the way to go.

flexor will also be available for dsp systems.
@plonter
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:43 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by @plonter »

Hi

if no one post that before!

Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?


:D
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by ReD_MuZe »

sure
@plonter
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:43 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by @plonter »

@plonter wrote:Hi

if no one post that before!

Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?


:D
ReD_MuZe wrote:sure
Aaa Yes in did a Fun Time :D
j9k
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: san diego
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by j9k »

One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.

Congrats assaf

J9k
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Re: FleXor future

Post by dawman »

Ladies & Gentlemen.....................j9k. ....... :D ........ankyu, ankyu.
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by ReD_MuZe »

j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.

Congrats assaf

J9k
true...

jude! been lookin for u!
:D
good to see u here :)
User avatar
Mary Mungo
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Rural Frivolity

Re: FleXor future

Post by Mary Mungo »

j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk. J9k
Does this mean that Scope and its sdk are now outdated and being superceeded by cpu based systems?
User avatar
Sounddesigner
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:06 pm

Re: FleXor future

Post by Sounddesigner »

I don't think we can fully assess SCOPE's RAM situation until XITE-1 is released. Unless i'm missing something.
Last edited by Sounddesigner on Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ReD_MuZe
Posts: 670
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: FleXor future

Post by ReD_MuZe »

is a classical guitar outdated and being superseded by electric guitar?
besides indeed xite should be able to do anything we plan for flexor modular.

you have to remember i had to use SDK for flexor, but now we are coding everything in c++ and SSE (assembly)
so flexor will be able to do much more than it could.
however this doesnt say anything about xite, the new sdk could be much more flexible, and you can always code in visualDSP (c style for analog devices) to get more out of SDK...
@plonter
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:43 am

Re: FleXor future

Post by @plonter »

Hello everybody

Asaf about cross platform,will Flexor Native be also for Mac(intel) or at first we will see Pc version and flow to it a Mac?

by flow i mean time based schedule to a Mac version release.
:)
Post Reply