and rise the priceReD_MuZe wrote:copy protection is over-rated.
FleXor future
Re: FleXor future
Re: FleXor future
stardust wrote:especially when dongles and their royalties are involved
which is why everyone should expect soon-cubase 5 to be much cheaper than cubase 4

Last edited by spacef on Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: FleXor future
Hi Happy New Year in Few Hours from Now 
One more concern !!
i'm hopping to see is a big graphic, same Native Plugins and fx have small really small knob skin and overall that killing my eyes
for example "Arturia MoogModular" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/moogmodularv.jpg
or "Void" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/void.jpg
Asaf make it look "BIG"

One more concern !!
i'm hopping to see is a big graphic, same Native Plugins and fx have small really small knob skin and overall that killing my eyes
for example "Arturia MoogModular" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/moogmodularv.jpg
or "Void" http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/void.jpg
Asaf make it look "BIG"

- FrancisHarmany
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Haarmania
Re: FleXor future
or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/...
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/...

- sonicstrav
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:00 pm
Re: FleXor future
Void looks horrible
Moog Modular V - I have this - sound quality hmmm........
Moog Modular V - I have this - sound quality hmmm........
Re: FleXor future
flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem 

Re: FleXor future
Very cool! 

The first action people should take is to remove cash from Banrural, and break the banks of corrupt people. #escandalogt
Re: FleXor future
If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD
Re: FleXor future
FrancisHarmany wrote:or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/...
ReD_MuZe wrote:flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem
i get it Now
amazing

Re: FleXor future
nop. math is math. the emulations sound bad for other reasonsironman wrote:If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD

any emulation is doomed to sound worse than the original. especially ones that are originated in analog circuitry.
take virus for instance, the powecore version doesn't sound as good as the hardware version, yet they both use exactly the same dsp chip. why? optimization and marketing decisions i guess.
dsp has many other benefits: its much cheaper than cpu processors, its more stable, almost no latency, and it doesn't come with some cumbersome OS attached. if one wants to make computer detached hardware - dsp is the way to go.
flexor will also be available for dsp systems.
Re: FleXor future
Hi
if no one post that before!
Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?

if no one post that before!
Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?

Re: FleXor future
sure
Re: FleXor future
@plonter wrote:Hi
if no one post that before!
Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?
Aaa Yes in did a Fun TimeReD_MuZe wrote:sure

Re: FleXor future
One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.
Congrats assaf
J9k
Congrats assaf
J9k
computers read lips
http://sites.google.com/site/j9kj9kj9k/
http://sites.google.com/site/j9kj9kj9k/
Re: FleXor future
Ladies & Gentlemen.....................j9k. .......
........ankyu, ankyu.

Re: FleXor future
true...j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.
Congrats assaf
J9k
jude! been lookin for u!

good to see u here

- Mary Mungo
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:16 am
- Location: Rural Frivolity
Re: FleXor future
Does this mean that Scope and its sdk are now outdated and being superceeded by cpu based systems?j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk. J9k
- Sounddesigner
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:06 pm
Re: FleXor future
I don't think we can fully assess SCOPE's RAM situation until XITE-1 is released. Unless i'm missing something.
Last edited by Sounddesigner on Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: FleXor future
is a classical guitar outdated and being superseded by electric guitar?
besides indeed xite should be able to do anything we plan for flexor modular.
you have to remember i had to use SDK for flexor, but now we are coding everything in c++ and SSE (assembly)
so flexor will be able to do much more than it could.
however this doesnt say anything about xite, the new sdk could be much more flexible, and you can always code in visualDSP (c style for analog devices) to get more out of SDK...
besides indeed xite should be able to do anything we plan for flexor modular.
you have to remember i had to use SDK for flexor, but now we are coding everything in c++ and SSE (assembly)
so flexor will be able to do much more than it could.
however this doesnt say anything about xite, the new sdk could be much more flexible, and you can always code in visualDSP (c style for analog devices) to get more out of SDK...
Re: FleXor future
Hello everybody
Asaf about cross platform,will Flexor Native be also for Mac(intel) or at first we will see Pc version and flow to it a Mac?
by flow i mean time based schedule to a Mac version release.

Asaf about cross platform,will Flexor Native be also for Mac(intel) or at first we will see Pc version and flow to it a Mac?
by flow i mean time based schedule to a Mac version release.
