PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

stardust wrote:

alfonso wrote:Hey Dudes, can we post the Xite video to youtube? that's the only way to embed it in some Music Forums topics around, which would be very useful, because there aren't any other videos about it.

Gary is at gearjunkies

But it is remarkable indeed that neither Xite nor solaris has generated so much 'videos' or 'reviews' like UAD and Virus and C5

I'm going to be updating the video - so this link may change.
youtube and other site posts will follow - but I need to update the video first.

Greg

Anyone can tell me if the expresscard for laptop is 34 or 54? Or would fit in both? The 54 conector is bigger, so if you have a laptop with 34 one, will cannot plug that in.

Another question, what about a cut down version of the Xite-1? Is not planned at all, or maybe in the future, any news?

All this talk about Solaris and Xite. Anyone other than I interested just in Scope 5 w/ the old cards? I can't understand why they (S/C) can't release it already and let only Xite buyers wait. Or if it's not finished, please, release a public beta or release candidate.

garyb wrote: What is the upgrade procedure from scope PCI to Xite in terms of HW and in terms of SW?
hw? just plug in the XITE. sw? none.

That doesn't sound like upgrade. I've heard some companies provide upgrade options for hardware too. (ProTools, anyone?). I'm pretty sure this forum alone would buy A LOT of xites if there were a decent upgrade path from old cards.

oxygenial wrote:The driver model for Vista (and sadly Windows 7) is a huge problem, and I seriously can't see why Microsoft chose to do it this way, where you can't address the hardware directly from your application, without passing through the OS!

Because at least 80% of Windows XP crashes come from drivers that are not written to the spec. And in XP drivers were able to crash the OS. (Actually drivers did not, XP does it itself - the only sane option to do when a driver misbehaves). Expect a lot better stability in Vista, not to mention Win7 that is already a lot better than Vista (there was the 20% of other crashes than drivers, not anymore).

spoimala wrote:All this talk about Solaris and Xite. Anyone other than I interested just in Scope 5 w/ the old cards?!

Im talking about Xite and Solaris because they're future - I think the current cards are obsolete - Xite have better stability, better memory subsystem and are faster. SC can't go up against the competition with the current cards.

spoimala wrote:That doesn't sound like upgrade. I've heard some companies provide upgrade options for hardware too. (ProTools, anyone?). I'm pretty sure this forum alone would buy A LOT of xites if there were a decent upgrade path from old cards.!

SC could raise the price of Xite with $1000 and then give you those $1000 back to you for upgrading from the current cards.

UAD2 Quad (without much software) costs $1500 for 4 * ADSP-21369 and you need 3 Quad cards to equal the power of Xite. SC could offer vouchers for the Shop if you upgraded from the current cards.

lagoausente wrote:Anyone can tell me if the expresscard for laptop is 34 or 54? Or would fit in both? The 54 conector is bigger, so if you have a laptop with 34 one, will cannot plug that in.

Another question, what about a cut down version of the Xite-1? Is not planned at all, or maybe in the future, any news?

No one have a reply fo me?

I really don't understand the point of asking that SC offer a hardware upgrade when anyone who wants that can just sell their existing cards here on the forum or ebay or something & put the money towards an XITE. If SC offered a HW upgrade then it would be them that would have to begin selling Used cards, which would cost them time which = money. Sorry. but it just seems like asking for a HW upgrade path from SC is asking too much.

Mark

lagoausente wrote:

lagoausente wrote:Anyone can tell me if the expresscard for laptop is 34 or 54? Or would fit in both? The 54 conector is bigger, so if you have a laptop with 34 one, will cannot plug that in.

Another question, what about a cut down version of the Xite-1? Is not planned at all, or maybe in the future, any news?

No one have a reply fo me?

I'm pretty sure that JimmyV said it uses the 34 version.

Thanks, searching doesn´t take in account numbers 34, 54

JimmyV wrote:Also for anyone who wants to become more mobile, the 34mm PCI-e connector is what Soniccore chose to use. The 54mm size had stability issues.

You can find it here on the 'Namm Show and Sonic-core' thread (page 8 )

Mark

Also for anyone who wants to become more mobile, the 34mm PCI-e connector is what Soniccore chose to use. The 54mm size had stability issues.
Recent trends in laptop designs from Lenovo and Sager are using a larger port for 2 x external connectors.

He refers to PCI-e, not to Expresscard.

Yup, but EC 34 or EC45 do refer to the Express Card Slots (external).

lagoausente wrote:

lagoausente wrote:Anyone can tell me if the expresscard for laptop is 34 or 54? Or would fit in both? The 54 conector is bigger, so if you have a laptop with 34 one, will cannot plug that in.

Another question, what about a cut down version of the Xite-1? Is not planned at all, or maybe in the future, any news?

No one have a reply fo me?

It's the 34, but with the PCI-e 1X, I think you can go with the narrower slot and use an adapter on the notebooks.
Not sure all the options, since the demo unit at NAMM had the wide slot.

I'm sure SC is planning a scaled down version at some point in the future.

Greg

stardust wrote:Well the HW upgrade/replacement option has not been proposed by me, but came from SC somehow.

Anyway...it is speculation

I got an offer from S|C to replace my broken 15 DSP board too... but it was the saddest offer you can imagine

I guess that the release time is imminent, then... Just speculating, of course

Tau wrote:
I got an offer from S|C to replace my broken 15 DSP board too... but it was the saddest offer you can imagine

hmm... did it involve killing a cute kitten?

next to nothing wrote: hmm... did it involve killing a cute kitten?

I obviously undervalued your imagination...

cute kittens are quite cheap where I live, though...

stardust wrote:What does the PCIe card require from mainboard. 1x lane 4x, 16x ?

x1, as ralf told me once when I asked him. express cards are x1, too, so this makes sense, since there was no hint yet on degraded performance when going mobile.
.oO( ok, they could use a physical x4 with a single lane connected, but this would make absolutely no sense )

-greetings, markus-

kylie wrote:

stardust wrote:What does the PCIe card require from mainboard. 1x lane 4x, 16x ?

x1, as ralf told me once when I asked him. express cards are x1, too, so this makes sense, since there was no hint yet on degraded performance when going mobile.
.oO( ok, they could use a physical x4 with a single lane connected, but this would make absolutely no sense )

-greetings, markus-

What I was told at NAMM is that it's 1X - also as Gary mentions on the video.

Greg

http://www.thomann.de/gb/soniccore_xite_1.htm

Is this a new price ?

It got me thinking.....the new PCM96 Surround is 2900 Pounds.
The Bricasto Model 7 is the same.....
With the new 5.1 Room for SFP, the XITE-1 can do surround w/ quality verb and then master,FX and synths too.

XITE-1 sure looks even better than ever.

A full studio for approximately $3800US vs. a (very nice) reverb?

Such a deal.

Greg

XITE-1/4LIVE wrote:It got me thinking.....the new PCM96 Surround is 2900 Pounds.
The Bricasto Model 7 is the same.....
With the new 5.1 Room for SFP, the XITE-1 can do surround w/ quality verb and then master,FX and synths too.

XITE-1 sure looks even better than ever.

Let us be fair - The reverbs in PCM96 and M7 are in another league - they're not just a little bit better - they are WAY better.

You could also compare the preamps of the Xite with AMS Neve 1073 DPD - http://www.thomann.de/gb/ams_neve_1073_ ... stereo.htm or compare the the AD stage with Lavry Ad122 - http://vintageking.com/Shop-New-Categor ... 2-96-MKIII - well they're in a different league.

Xite is an awesome product, but.............................