Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:54 pm

Scope Users Community
https://www.scopeusers.com/forums/
i agree 100%Conqueror's Reign wrote:Ralf
Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to reply to this post. This is truly THE best community i have ever seen, everyone no matter position, title or skill level is always willing to help and share wherever the need may be, their knowledge, opinions and experience. All are made to feel equal here, its awesome!
Ralf, will they have special modeled filters?Ralf wrote:Hi,
these synths won't be for free. Before we can integrate them into the onlineshop, we have to do some testings. Moreover we have to make a .......
Ok I will try:judiefre1 wrote:what do u guys think these 3 synths are imitations of or one of a kind? are they unique synths with own new sounds or are they imitations of synths like the nord lead 3?
What I meant was more about how they look ("front" panel - wise) rather than how they sound (which for me would be the most important) as I never heard any of them (nor the inspired scope models, nor the "original" ones).Conqueror's Reign wrote:For someone who has never played or experienced a virus, k station or clavia
Just out of curiosity if those are indeed the synths and HuroLura guessed correctly. Are those 3 so individually unique that scope with the current synths cant produce their sound now?
Would you go buy one of them?
oops, sorry for the sluggish writing, I should have mentioned that 'typical' library use was assumed, as very few people deal with the fundamental code of the respective platform.hifiboom wrote:I think thats not completly right !
It really renders down to the question, if a synth have extra builded dsp code for example for the oscillators and more importantly the filters... + maybe special fx.
...
astro, I absolutly aggree on what you said.astroman wrote:oops, sorry for the sluggish writing, I should have mentioned that 'typical' library use was assumed, as very few people deal with the fundamental code of the respective platform.hifiboom wrote:I think thats not completly right !
It really renders down to the question, if a synth have extra builded dsp code for example for the oscillators and more importantly the filters... + maybe special fx.
...
Flexor is a good example as even in it's original form it deviates significantly from the 'Creamware soundprint' - which alone makes it a must-have...
as math models (or their implementation) varies, so will the tone of the resulting instruments, altered additionally by conversion and analog output stages.
that's why imho it's rather unlikely that an SFP synth will sound identical to a (say) Clavia.
I completely agree with your bottomline and even would extend it to no other platform has achieved such a wide variety of sound as SFP
cheers, Tom
at that such a high quality.no other platform has achieved such a wide variety of sound as SFP
regarding '100% analog synths' and some hybrid ones like the 'Oscar' it's already difficult to build a 'common' model, as no 2 specimen will be exactly the same, aging of parts has an additional influence to what was already mentioned....In order for the sharc technology to truly mimic another synth like the ones mentioned, it would have to go deeper than just creating the plug in exactly the same...