Bud Weiser wrote:dante wrote:If SC were as big as Steinburg, UAD or Propellorhead I would agree with you. But the reality of a small company having to do other things to earn food for thier family and implementing expensive bug fixing just doesn't scale.
The others started as small companies to, everyone did.
Some had/have luck, others don´t.
I´d call it destiny.
Maybe some did mistakes others not or less of these, who knows ?
It´s just only anything any customer shouldn´t have to think about, isn´t it ?
Doesn´t mean I won´t support anyone, but it also cannot be a precondition, you, as a customer,
have to support someone running a biz.
Just only my opinion.
Bud
That's true also.
There's no one to blame anyway, it is like it is.
Some masterplan should arise, but we users don't know anything.
If it's true that once we were with 35000+ users, crowd funding would be an option, or something like Jimmy suggested recently.
To be honest I don't think any surface restyling of the current system will ever happen, the thing we have is the thing we have.
Which thing is really a great thing, and fundamentaly not outdated.
The direct analogy with setting up a hardware studio is just right and of a natural beauty, but if you ever worked with music apps on a tablet you can imagine that new potential users of Scope -used to that integrated easyness- will call SFP harsh.
Not because of the base, but because of a (restricted) list of old fasioned or even stupid details in gui or procedures.
What will a potential user think of the midi handling, the project screensets handling or the saving routines today?
Some details we all know:
Why do you have to switch to different folders on your harddisk when saving a preset or a project, given you use the standard Scope folders for those?
Why the hack can't you see the preset name in the modules gui window?
Why all those weird mouse activities just for changing to another screenshot? A little 1-2-3- switcher in thetop of the life bar would suffice.
Why not showing the added midi cc number in 'current' before the controller window closes, so you don't need to open it again to be shure, and can't those creepy Midi+ or Midi- symbols (as I can't call them really buttons ) be changed into a simple 'apply' or something? (Compare the old VSTi OSCar Midi assigning method...).
Why all those popping up windows anyway? etc. .
I love my Scope Studio, even while having to have the cards in a separate old Quicksilver mac, I'm old style and used to combine hardware and software, but new young customers might have doubts having a first look.
You guys know the way you make music on a tablet with all the different apps?
It's unbelievably easy, I saw it with a close friend who's used to make techno music and now does it on his iPad, in his spare time. You kick around all the wanted connections or files just like nothing!
If you're used to that user communication level, and you then want to scale up to a more professional mixing and mastering system, then Scope is the most complete and best sounding system which is affordable.
But those shabby details and that improvised looking window handling will it make hard to convince the fast living new tablet generation I'm afraid.
The market is there, and the solution is there, but some restyling wouldn't misfit.
I have an UAD Quad card, just the hardware and the few included standard plug-ins.
(I feel tempted to buy the Neve package).
A similar S/C card could be a monymaker and a seductive step to Xite.
Put a few plugs on it to start with, and make the big synth emulations and the special and mastering plugins optional, and there you go: a direct alternative for the UAD card.
The price could be quite competitive, as the plugs are already there.
I know, this idea is not new, but it just came in my mind again when checking the available UAD plug-ins tonight.
I would easily put a 500 euro in a decent users crowd funding program to make this or another smart devellopment plan possible.
But then S/C would need to change stategy, and play the public card.
Ah well, just thinking, and asking myself what could I do, what would I want, and what's needed for it and for the future
