Please - Hijack this thread

of course, taking a child to vent overly zoomed views of adults is a well known and legitimate trick in cartoon's land...

Bill, lovely you, thank you, I hate your style, but you kept the mac alife through the years, I love you, as I'm still not forced to work on chaotic Windows on crappy and ugly pc's. also keep on selling ipods, as the buyers pay the development of OSX for me!
Don't give us too much choices with the mac, I hate freedom and choices, but make sure the machine is complete and works out of the box when I buy one.
I'd like to see you as CEO of SC, Scope would be big in two years, and Stardust would suffer from an immense and acute loyality conflict...

wayne · Post by **wayne** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:54 pm

BingoTheClowno wrote:I don't see what is funny in those cartoons. It's totally bizzare, who would care what would a 5 year old have to say?

Me. I have one.

The cartoons aren't funny for me either, but i find your second sentence very bizarre, indeed.

BingoTheClowno · Post by **BingoTheClowno** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:06 pm

You're right, it does sound like I don't like kids, isn't it?
I meant, who would care what would a 5 year old have to say in a blog.

Post by **hubird** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:17 pm

BingoTheClowno wrote: who would care what would a 5 year old have to say in a blog.

The comedy kid would agree immediately, that's exactly why he would like to have a celebrity in his blog - to get the chicks - the latter being the link
to the adults I was talking about

In the end it's about the virtuality of the internet, think of those porn downloaders who react to pixels as if it's the real thing

Yet, in the current case, I don't like it so much when a comedy paper takes it's own identity as part of the clue.

BingoTheClowno · Post by **BingoTheClowno** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:30 pm

I don't know any 5 year old that wants to "date chicks"

Post by **hubird** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:31 pm

that's why it's a comedy for adults...a man thinks of sex every 52 seconds, if you agree about the definition these reports handle (I do).

BingoTheClowno · Post by **BingoTheClowno** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:32 pm

hubird wrote:
Yet I don't like it so much when a comedy paper takes it's own identity as part of the clue.

I don't understand.

BingoTheClowno · Post by **BingoTheClowno** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:37 pm

hubird wrote:that's why it's a comedy for adults...a man thinks of sex every 52 seconds, if you agree about the definition these reports handle (I do).

Maybe subconsciously.

(on the other hand, this is page 69 so, it must be true because I was thinking about sex right now)

Post by **hubird** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:49 pm

Probably, at least you can measure the activity of the brain part which seems to rule the sexual activity.

About your former post, well, the blog the kid is making and the comedy as what you actually are looking at, melt together in the last picture.
At least that's how I see it.
What I meant was just that I mostly don't concider it very humoristic when the medeum is the message, or something:-)

BingoTheClowno wrote: (on the other hand, this is page 69 so, it must be true because I was thinking about sex right now)

your forum style gets better every day, seriously