PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

garyb wrote:blood cults were common in human history.

even today, big cities are built on the blood sacrifice of fellow human beings. believe it.
almost every really big building has a story and many have a plaque dedicated to those who made the "brave sacrifice" to build it.
soldiers always "commit the ultimate sacrifice".
what in the world do they mean by that?

yes, it's books that tell these things. it's also books that tell opposite things. none of us were there. there is evidence even today, however. it''s in the language and everywhere. the ancients may have known secrets, but they were not necessarily nice.

Lol you made me laugh, good one



You know, "the Champs-Elysées" (what's that??) , the arch (do you see her little sister far away ?), anonym dead(s) sacrified for the cult inside an enfired grave, between 2 columns.... I'm sorry guys, that's purely coincidence....pffff....retards ...
Looks like a Conan the barbarian scene, even more the july 14th, with army walking on the Champs-Elysées...They look like (evil) priests on the walk

'sanctified ground"...

And I got the steve Vai version too !

hahaha! throw up the horns!

If conspiracies were true, i would have been informed....
Even more, i've never read anything about your conspiracy tales and stupidities...that's true that i never read at all, but i only trust what I see and read by myself (If i don't know something, i'll find an expert on TV to explain me, as simply as that)...
But i don't have time for those trivial new age delirium, I think our leaders are here cause they love us (some of them are a little bad, but all the others are very nice).

Say hi !

A kiss to daddy ???

Ok..i know what you're thinking...those daddies are not so cool...
We're in 2016 (think "progress"....THINK !!! ), you can have plenty of daddies !!!
make a hug !

(and they can use girls toilets)

humor?

Not at all !
Are you telling me that you believe that those guys are ploting against us ?
pfffffff crazy
and man didn't went to the moon and blabla......

http://imgur.com/gallery/dzSyE48

lik I said, humor.
Amazon image: 'tags: [...], humor.'

Nestor wrote:There are strong proves to demonstrate that we are much, much older than stated by some of the tendencies of modern anthropology, and that we have had glorious times in this earth before, a long time ago, and that we have had technologies years light more advanced than today:

There's not one 'strong prove' to find that this nonsens is true Nestor.
Scientific world would get crazy of enthousiasm and exaltation, they would jump onto it if only one tiny inimini small prove thingie were found.
Journals would open their frontpages with big chocolate letters, it would remove any ongoing war from the front pages.
Especially if the prove would include that peace was all over the place during that pre-ancient time...it would be the holy grail!
You can't imagine bigger news, all over the world

Exactly !
Like i said, if some things have been hidden, we should have known it !
That's a proof that nothing's hidden !

Concerning pyramids and that kind of stuff, the fact is that they're front of us, and have been made in a time when mankind only had simple tools to work with, so it's a proof that pyramids can be build with simple tools...

guppy wrote:Exactly !
Like i said, if some things have been hidden, we should have known it !
That's a proof that nothing's hidden !

I love irony, guppy
But I'm serious, it would be breaking news

Btw, alas, evolution is based on the struggle of the fittest (for reproduction), so instant peace would be quite contradictional to the phenomenon of life.
We, the human race, have to face that there's good and bad.

Yet, how bad our societies may look like, they prove we do better already than pure evolution.
See, Trump doesn't kill Clinton, although he would like it

hubird wrote: But I'm serious, it would be breaking news

I'm serious, i said exactly what you said in another manner
Does it look naive ?

Well, you're making more of my statement than is implemented.
I'm not saying that something can't be true because otherwise we had known it.
I'm just saying that we had known it if there was prove or evidence.
I asked for that evidence, as Nestor said in that quote that there's strong prove.
Just show me that prove, is the message.

And no, that 'prove' wouldn't be hidden, you can't.
You can't delete mails without getting caught, and you can't hide that your a sexist pervert.
Leaks are everywhere, especially with groundbreaking things like an evolutionary break as Nestor suggest.

Not to mention that scientists would be incited to publish a finding of that calibre...


Not as big as the supposed evolutionary break of Nestor, yet showing the incitement of scientists to publish about a surprising and important find of a creature between ape and early human:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/e ... ce.aaa1343

hubird wrote: Not to mention that scientists would be incited to publish a finding of that calibre...

In the same way, there can be lots of reasons to not publish a finding of that calibre.
The fact is we can't know at all what was homo sapiens sapiens 50.000 years ago. Nobody can know.
You can't really tell with the scientific method when antic stones have been cut by men, so it's normal to have a lot of speculations about ancient history

guppy wrote:

hubird wrote: Not to mention that scientists would be incited to publish a finding of that calibre...

In the same way, there can be lots of reasons to not publish a finding of that calibre.

Fair enough, in some circuits, or with certain individuals.
A Christian or Moslim fundamentalist dictator, afraid for the evolution theory undermining his authority, a jealous colleague scientist, a conspiracy lover, etc.

You can't hide it worldwide tho, and not for long.

Scientific speculation is fine with me, archeology is used to it and needs it to formulate new investigation theses, because getting evidence is hard in this part of science.

wow...

yeah, tremendously funny

I'd like to know myself how an ancient civilisation can move that kind of thing :

not only one, but thousands of them.
I think the only way to do it with conventional tools was to use the strenght of some kind of elephants or mammoths, but they should have use 100's for only one stone...
Another possibility is that they had a kind of knowledge that we don't use because we lost it....who knows....