Bye-Bye Big Mixer

Tips and advice for getting the most from Scope. No questions here please.

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
wayne
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Australia

Post by wayne »

Automation - getting your sequencer to twiddle knobs & faders 4 you in the mix. Often fairly dodgy, in my experience
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

On 2002-05-25 03:14, djevo wrote:
Algorythm >>: would you also 'advice' to don't use the Pulsar mixer that comes with the ProPack?
It depends on your style, as I have said all along. I just mixed two acoustic guitars and vocals in the pulsar mixer because it is 0 latency and because of the high quality effects (masterverb, and the SSB stuff). But when I make my music, I am still mixing in Cubase. I use synths and FX outta pulsar. mix, sequence, more FX in cubase. the VST FX are WAY MORE experimental than anything on pulsar. The propac mixer is much better than the big mixer, i still don't use it much though.
djevo
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by djevo »

On 2002-05-25 03:22, wayne wrote:
Automation - getting your sequencer to twiddle knobs & faders 4 you in the mix. Often fairly dodgy, in my experience
Explain 'dodgy' to me... that isn't very positive I think?
djevo
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by djevo »

On 2002-05-25 06:33, algorhythm wrote:
It depends on your style, as I have said all along. I just mixed two acoustic guitars and vocals in the pulsar mixer because it is 0 latency and because of the high quality effects (masterverb, and the SSB stuff). But when I make my music, I am still mixing in Cubase. I use synths and FX outta pulsar. mix, sequence, more FX in cubase. the VST FX are WAY MORE experimental than anything on pulsar. The propac mixer is much better than the big mixer, i still don't use it much though.
What do you mean by way more experimantal? You think they are better to use then the Pulasr FX?
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

"better" depends on what you are doing - freeware VST stuff can afford to be more innovative and experimental because they literally have nothing to lose. Creamware is trying to make money, and studio professionals are more likely to buy more than us "normal" musicians = more conservative plugins. Frankly, I use both pulsar and VST, the VST stuff is just awful neat to me right now . . .

stuff like:
GRM tools (not free)
plogue's mixed grains and rebuilder
*anything* from tobybear - he is god - deconstructor and robobear :grin: and silverbox?!?!
the destroy fx crew - buffer override is absolutely sick! skidder too
ohm force's "fromhage" > it ain't no everyday filter!
some of mda's stuff is pretty wierd
smart electronix cyanide

Pulsar doesn't have: resynthesis like "rebuilder", granulation like "robobear", reordering algorithms like deconstructor (rotor oscillator on pulsar is close but less controlled) -
pulsar does have really good quality plugins, but most are pretty ordinary. good standard effects. but we must look outside of the box for access to more experimental stuff, and that is where all of the fun is . . .

I use destroy, plogue, and toby stuff pretty much religiously now. there are links to alla that stuff on my website under "studio", which is in my signature.

_________________
<font size="-1">algorhythm</algorhythm</font> - "I enjoy occasionally wandering around randomly, and often find that when I do so, I get to where I wanted to be."

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: algorhythm on 2002-05-26 08:35 ]</font>
djevo
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by djevo »

Pulsar doesn't have: resynthesis like "rebuilder", granulation like "robobear", reordering algorithms like deconstructor (rotor oscillator on pulsar is close but less controlled)
You probaly like this one the most..? :wink:

I'll check your site soon! (it's a bit late now)
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

:wink: - actually - I just posted a beta version of a track "rez127" in the song area here. You will hear a really resonated sequenced sound at about 2:00 - that is our very own orbitone 303 w/full resonance (hence the name rez127 :wink: )which goes to -> DigitalFishPhones Dominion -> Plogue Rebuilder -> TobyBear Deconstructor. So, yep, I like em!

_________________
<font size="-1">algorhythm</algorhythm</font> - "I enjoy occasionally wandering around randomly, and often find that when I do so, I get to where I wanted to be."

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: algorhythm on 2002-05-26 14:57 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: algorhythm on 2002-05-26 14:57 ]</font>
djevo
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by djevo »

I've just listend to She Said Nevermind and I must say it sounds original! How do you describe your style?

I have to admit that I only listened to it on pc-speakers so I can't get into the details of sounds spcifics but the overall song sounds cool! (we're going OT.... a lot :smile:

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: djevo on 2002-05-26 16:59 ]</font>
Post Reply