Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
by spiderman
as usual 1:1 emulation...
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:16 am
by Mr Arkadin
Don't even get me started on this. i love these (a la Gary Numan's Telekon and HH's Chameleon). Great aftertouch thingy. i love my Oddity too but if it was in SFP i'd never use a VSTi again (well apart from the upcoming impOSCar). Please CreamWare strike a deal with GMedia/Ohmforce!
Oh, also the Explorer I had a good bass sound too (listen to early Philip Glass ensemble - thundering bass arpeggios. A sort of ARP with switchable skins/sound would cover all three (Pro-Soloist/Pro-DGX/Explorer I).
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:47 am
by spiderman
bingo !
I like a lot the philip glass essemble too !!
the osc on the pro soloist is very special . I remember it was made with a very high frequency pulse divided into 6 sub harmonics . something like that . maybe someone has more info about that to do somthing with the modular ? by the way I've just flexorize my mod2 ! this thing is great !!!
the last time I used a vsti it was 3 years ago ! it's vintage software now ! 8^))
with the modular and feedback loop you can do some effect ala ohmforce
your are right about covering the 3 models .
a 3:3 emulation !
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spiderman on 2003-10-01 11:03 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 5:46 am
by spiderman
hey creamware !
all you need to do a 1:1 emulation is here :
http://l2.espacenet.com/espacenet/bnsvi ... 930429A1+I+
(this is the arp pro soloist patent with schematics etc ..)
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 9:20 am
by enumeratus
cheers - got it
so - what about an ARP Odyssey coming to SFP next?
any more votes for it?
Klaus Piehl
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:50 am
by scary808
The Oddyssey has my vote!
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 3:32 am
by kimgr
cheers - got it
so - what about an ARP Odyssey coming to SFP next?
any more votes for it?
Klaus Piehl
That's really funny Klaus.
Seems most people here don't know who you are, or this post would have had a lot more attention !?
And yes, you have my vote 4 Odyssey as well, keep up the good work
Kim.
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 6:48 am
by Mr Arkadin
Klaus was one of the MiniMax developers i believe
C'mon Klaus you know you want to do it - let's see some ARP's, and how about an Oberheim OB-Xa for some serious heavyweight sounds? And...
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:06 pm
by Matthias
Hey, Klaus.
You got my vote too
Best, Matthias.
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:16 pm
by Mr Arkadin
Get coding you guys
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:06 am
by spiderman
have we to understand that an ARP Odyssey is planned to release next for sfp ?
great !!!!
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: spiderman on 2003-10-06 06:06 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 6:46 am
by next to nothing
hm. i'd rather have an ms-20, but thats just me
Oh, and a beat sampler/slicer/destructor, whatever. i know its doable in modIII/Flexor, but having a nice standalone beatbox with nice analougish filters and a neat interface would look swell on my system. Combine that with a standalone SFP pattern sequencer that i also want, and im a happy man
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:39 am
by spiderman
I vote for the odyssey as I've got a real MS20 !
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:09 am
by wayne
you have my vote
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:37 pm
by thorkell
yeb you've got my vote on this!
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 5:16 pm
by dehuszar
One vote here. Though I really want to see an wurlitzer/fender-stage/farfisa/etc. piano plug first.
Sam
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:42 am
by Eric Dahlberg
Asketh & thou shall receiveth, boys (cough, cough).
Hey, if you CW guys need an OB-Xa to tear apart, call me. It's like that old joke, "take my wife...please", I can't stand that damn thing.
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:44 am
by Eric Dahlberg
(this is the arp pro soloist patent with schematics etc ..)
That's really enough for component modelling. They need to have the real physical thing in front of them because components' values change depending on their proximities to one another. Any company that isn't actually measuring a real working model (cough, PHP, cough) isn't doing it right.
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:53 am
by decimator
I vote a massive NO for duplicates !!!
B2003 was enough, now an odissey ?!
Of course, it will be a tad better than the natives but it's just a waste of coding ressources !!!
So : my vote for a vintage not done YET or something really new for a change but I question CW's desire to do something " inovative ", so prove me badly wrong ...
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:23 pm
by Eric Dahlberg
What jerks, huh? I mean, they come out with Six String, Lightwave, Poison, Vectron, Prism, & STS-500 yet they think that's enough? Solaris & the 70 new Adern modules don't cut it, either, we need more innovation!!!