Page 1 of 3
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:36 am
by AndreD
<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="
http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .mdl"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: Effect<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Requires: sfp 3.1<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> <b>master d</b> - multiband mastering compressor
beta <b>1.7</b>
<b>features:</b>
<ul>
<li>3 band compression</li>
<li>3 band softclip</li>
<li>phase coherent </li>
<li>build in look ahead detection</li>
<li>easy to use</li>
<li>bass delay</li>
</ul>
<b>known bugs:</b>
<ul>
<li>presetlist not working</li>
<li>dsp error @ 96 kHz (algorythm is too big for a single dsp)</li>
</ul>
...any suggestion is welcome
best,
andre
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-27 19:20 ]</font><BR><BR><a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="
http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... bt_1_7.jpg" BORDER="0">
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 8:32 am
by cannonball
hi
thanks i'll try
sometime ago i've seen here a device called
psybass just for few hour there's a way to try or in alpha beta stage?
alessandro
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:28 am
by AndreD
hi,
the "bass" algorythm will be included in master-d in an upcoming release.
best,
andre
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2004 4:33 pm
by scary808
Thanks! I'm near the mastering stage of my new track so I'll give it a try.
P.S. I happen to like the current GUI. The clear, laid out, easy to read, "generic SFP look" shouts legitimacy.
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 7:40 am
by deejaysly
For some reason I get a DSP overload ("Big modules do not fit") message when trying to load this device. Strange error considering I have about 95% of my DSP load remaining. lol
Anyone else experience this?
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 7:59 am
by samplaire
I have no probs loading it - Mac Pulsar1/LunaII.
Andre, I've got a question on using it:
- what is the neutral freq adjust position? I've tried some and haven't found.
Yes, the gui is clear like a baby's chick
Thank you
_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-02-13 08:00 ]</font>
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:26 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-13 07:40, deejaysly wrote:
For some reason I get a DSP overload ("Big modules do not fit") message when trying to load this device. Strange error considering I have about 95% of my DSP load remaining. lol
Anyone else experience this?
the whole algorythm is calculated on a single dsp to avoid phase problems.
what board and what kind of software are you using?
best,
andre
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:31 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-13 07:59, samplaire wrote:
I have no probs loading it - Mac Pulsar1/LunaII.
Andre, I've got a question on using it:
- what is the neutral freq adjust position? I've tried some and haven't found.
Yes, the gui is clear like a baby's chick
Thank you
_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-02-13 08:00 ]</font>
hi,
you get a neutral frequency when all 3 bands are set to the same level. (doubleclick) AND if there is no compression.
if you compress the signal, you have to adjust them manuelly...
best,
andre
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:46 am
by samplaire
That was so obvious!
Thanks!
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 4:30 pm
by deejaysly
Andre,
I've figured it out.
It don't like 48kHz sample rate.
Changed to 44.1 and it loaded fine.
Regards.
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:24 pm
by AndreD
thank you deejaysly!
..so I have to spread the algorythms over more dsps..
best,
andre
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:47 pm
by AndreD
...updated (1.4)!
48 khz bug fixed, features added and still free
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-15 16:39 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 4:40 pm
by AndreD
...updated (beta 1.5)
-output gain fixed (-0,3 db)
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:55 pm
by Stige
How about a mono version of this device. It sounds nice and 'vintage' with vocals

Getting better.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-02-16 19:55 ]</font>
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:17 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-16 19:55, Stige wrote:
How about a mono version of this device. It sounds nice and 'vintage' with vocals

Getting better.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-02-16 19:55 ]</font>
good idea
best,
andre
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:56 am
by MCCY
Hi!
I'm very impressed. Sounds, as it is really phase coherent - I thought this is a difficult thing for multibands! Nice work.
I like it's surface very much, but what about a box which opens seperately, where you can adjust some other values: Frequency for each band etc.
The softclipping is a bit agressive for my taste. (When I use it for mastering, there is a very small point in the values which makes the right amount - and then a second later it overdrives the signal totally. Difficult to adjust.)I'd like to disable it. I find it very difficult to find values which don't distort too much.
But WOW!!!!! Very nice from you, to let us test the betas for free!!!!
Thanks
Martin
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:46 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-19 05:56, MCCYRANO wrote:
Hi!
I'm very impressed. Sounds, as it is really phase coherent - I thought this is a difficult thing for multibands! Nice work.
I like it's surface very much, but what about a box which opens seperately, where you can adjust some other values: Frequency for each band etc.
The softclipping is a bit agressive for my taste. (When I use it for mastering, there is a very small point in the values which makes the right amount - and then a second later it overdrives the signal totally. Difficult to adjust.)I'd like to disable it. I find it very difficult to find values which don't distort too much.
But WOW!!!!! Very nice from you, to let us test the betas for free!!!!
Thanks
Martin
...the release will be for free too

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:40 am
by samplaire
Thanks Andre

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2004 8:48 am
by marcuspocus
On 2004-02-19 06:46, Andre Dupke wrote:
...the release will be for free too
Even better

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 6:28 am
by MCCY
uff. das ist klasse!
Oh, I didn't realize that the final will be free too!!! Wow!!!
What about putting the softclippings in inerts!? So one could decide whatever to put in the 3 inserts for each band...
Oh, what about just the frequency splitter with 3 inserts!!!! One could even put Timeworks comp X in it for compression...
Martin