wmf-leak

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
virtualstudio
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Terranova-Amsterdam

Post by virtualstudio »

how seriuos do I have to take the newest Windows flaw?
here in holland they are makeing a big deal out of this, its all over the news: quote: "the biggest Windows securety leak ever!"
How do I limeted risk?
should I download the unofficial patch?(the official Microsoft patch is due for the 10th)
any info welcome.
regards
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

virtualstudio wrote:
how seriuos do I have to take the newest Windows flaw?
here in holland they are makeing a big deal out of this, its all over the news: quote: "the biggest Windows securety leak ever!"
How do I limeted risk?
should I download the unofficial patch?(the official Microsoft patch is due for the 10th)
any info welcome.
regards
Take it very seriously. Do not use IE - merely viewing the file in IE means you will be infected. The exploit is in the Windows metafile header parsing, so if one of these files ends up anywhere on your HDD, and the system e.g. indexes it, or creates a thumbnail image from it, you are infected. If you do not use IE, do not e.g. click on one of these metafiles as this will lead to infection (but viewing the image will not infect you).

They can even pretend to be a jpeg image, for example. IE will correctly identify it as a metafile and then parse the file - bang, you're infected.

Do not open or view any images in suspect emails - delete them.

To be honest, you're best off using a Unix-flavoured system/browser for internet access at the moment!

Royston
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

The unofficial patch is available here:

http://www.hexblog.com/index.html

If you use IE to browse t'internet, I would strongly recommend installing this patch.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

thanks.
virtualstudio
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Terranova-Amsterdam

Post by virtualstudio »

the offical http://www.microsoft.com/athome/securit ... 1_WMF.mspx is there to, it came earlyer.
User avatar
paulrmartin
Posts: 2445
Joined: Sun May 20, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by paulrmartin »

This was installed in my machine automatically last night.

Thanks for the heads-up though. :smile:
RedSun
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Near Montreal

Post by RedSun »

Why do people still use IE?

I mean, there's been something like 1 major flaw, backdoor, hole and whatnot found in it every week since Windows has been available.

It kind of reminds me of a scene in the Simpsons where Lisa puts electricity on some muffins and Bart keeps trying to grab them, saying ouch every time but still incapable of grasping the concept that something's wrong with them.



RedSun .:.
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

I use both because quite a few sites simply don't work properly in FF.
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Indeed.

IE is the biggest piece of dog poo ever to be squeezed from the old dog's filthy bottom.

Microsoft chiefs have shot one massive hole in their own companies feet through not helping & cooperating with the web community (specifically W3C) Through sloppy workmanship in general & in the case of IE on the web, threough not updating the software regularly enough with clean support of up to date web standards.

IE SUCKS .. big salty boll**ks
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Spirit, it's not FF to blame for that, it's actually Microsoft. Due to Microsoft & IE's lack of support for current web standards, web developers are having to do all sorts of 'workarounds' in their code to get todays code standards to display & funtion correctly in IE which hasn't seen a suitable update outside security for *YEARS*. This results in people trading off & saying, well if so many people are still using IE, I should probably code my site to work on that first & foremost ... wrong

Microdollar are being left behind with petted lips on this one with their crappy old browser, while Mozilla, Opera & Safari on the Mac, run away with the future of web browsing
Microboz are screwed in this respect unless they monopolise even more of the industry, which is a horrid but realistic thought.
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

I have finally found a browser that I like, and it's Mozilla.

I don't like IE because of security issues, mainly (and hey, it's by Microsoft). No tabbed browing either, which is a must as far as I'm concerned.

I don't like FireFox as it's such a *huge* resource hog and recently has had some serious security issues of its own.

I don't like Opera very much either - it tends to crash and is only compatible with about 10% of the internet :/

Mozilla simply works and doesn't cause me to tear my hair out or swear at my computer.

I think the current version is 1.7.12 - try it out, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Royston

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Counterparts on 2006-01-06 06:14 ]</font>
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

This flaw affects any browser including
Firefox and Mozilla. Listen to security now.

http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm

Patch here:

http://www.grc.com/sn/notes-020.htm
H-Rave
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Toulouse, France
Contact:

Post by H-Rave »

I would of course remind you that if you have an anti-virus, update it,because there is a virus definition for it.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: H-Rave on 2006-01-08 02:43 ]</font>
Post Reply