Page 1 of 1

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:15 am
by katano
any solution for this little riddle? :smile:

Image

enjoy :wink:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:46 am
by samplaire
I DON'T KNOW. :evil:

I'm sure it has something to the sloping line and the fact it devides some of the squares...
:sad:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:03 am
by wayne
Isn't there half a square missing from the top one ? :smile:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:08 am
by katano
On 2006-03-16 08:03, wayne wrote:
Isn't there half a square missing from the top one ? :smile:
i don't think so...

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:02 am
by wayne
- the slope cannot be a straight line and intersect the grid - 2:5 is not 3:8. Otherwise it all makes sense :smile:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:08 am
by alfonso
Isn't the sharpest angle of the red triangle a little different from the one in the green triangle? It's just as much as to make the relation between the cathetes different in the 2 triangles. If the green triangle is high 2 squares and large 5 squares, the red one that is high 3 squares should be large 7 and half squares, while it shows to be large 8 squares. That means that if you put the green (shorter) one up the other two L shaped polygones and the red (longer) aside, they will have less room than the other way around.

Cool anyway, I have to show it around...:smile:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:10 am
by alfonso
On 2006-03-16 09:02, wayne wrote:
- the slope cannot be a straight line and intersect the grid - 2:5 is not 3:8. Otherwise it all makes sense :smile:
You've beaten me in time! :lol:

Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:24 am
by katano
congrats to wayne and alfonso!!

wayne was first so he wins a dsp booster with 30 300mhz sharc dsp's :smile:

alfonso wins our respect for explaining the solution more detailed :wink:

cheerz
roman