Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:05 am
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jammusic on 2006-06-25 07:03 ]</font>
hi,
visitez http://www.d-mute.com
cheers,
didier,
PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com
Scope Users Community
https://www.scopeusers.com/forums/
at what time is the newt train?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:53 am
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:12 am
Or Celmo's personal page, as linked from http://www.celmo.com :
http://www.celmar-engel.com/references_page.htm
http://www.celmar-engel.com/references_page.htm
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:14 am
thanks
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:04 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:04 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:57 am
tracking, production and mixing for sure...
mastering usually involves very specialized hand made gear, if you're really talking about top flight, real mastering studios.....
otherwise, yes, people are using scope for mastering, but not at the highest levels. i'd ask why would they? real mastering studios don't use protools, they don't use just about ANY name brands that you might recognize, except maybe manley and apogee. there ARE plenty of REAL studios using scope, i don't get the question....Giftig's latest releases for BMG were mastered with scope(brainrox), does that count?
mastering usually involves very specialized hand made gear, if you're really talking about top flight, real mastering studios.....
otherwise, yes, people are using scope for mastering, but not at the highest levels. i'd ask why would they? real mastering studios don't use protools, they don't use just about ANY name brands that you might recognize, except maybe manley and apogee. there ARE plenty of REAL studios using scope, i don't get the question....Giftig's latest releases for BMG were mastered with scope(brainrox), does that count?
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:23 pm
in my conutry some example :
http://www.alarrecordingstudio.com/scop ... rm_2.shtml
http://www.studio-arianna.com/sito/pagit/lostudio.htm
http://www.jam-session.net/studio_di_re ... ecnica.php
http://www.musicity.it/studiodiregistrazione/studio.htm
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bronYaur on 2006-06-04 13:23 ]</font>
http://www.alarrecordingstudio.com/scop ... rm_2.shtml
http://www.studio-arianna.com/sito/pagit/lostudio.htm
http://www.jam-session.net/studio_di_re ... ecnica.php
http://www.musicity.it/studiodiregistrazione/studio.htm
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bronYaur on 2006-06-04 13:23 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:59 pm
simple isn't it?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:04 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:04 ]</font>
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:55 pm
you're right, my bad, i should have written more specificly: "i don't understand the point of this question".
...but then i didn't immediately recognize your screen name.....
no big deal, i don't need to know why, troll away...
...but then i didn't immediately recognize your screen name.....
no big deal, i don't need to know why, troll away...
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:48 pm
Cool
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:05 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:05 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:09 am
nah, it's all good!
i just tried to answer as best as i could.
i just tried to answer as best as i could.
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:02 am
again
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:05 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JamMusic on 2006-06-25 07:05 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:36 am
the "most known" mastering studios here in Italy, are equipped with sonic solutions, sadie and some expensive outboard.
The interesting point is that often, the results are not so good and in most of cases the mastering session is based on opening presets.
This is why many artists are avoiding this commercial circuit of studios to benefit the tools offered by low cost/high quality systems such as scope.
The interesting point is that often, the results are not so good and in most of cases the mastering session is based on opening presets.
This is why many artists are avoiding this commercial circuit of studios to benefit the tools offered by low cost/high quality systems such as scope.
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:42 am
we have a local radio station (1LIVE) that sends ALL their stuff through Optimaster...
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:53 am
My CD (my sig) has been totally produced and mastered with Scope and got some very good comments on how does it sound.
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:27 pm
Well my productions too,interely produced,mixed and mastered with scope (with some help of some other stuff like Har-bal and some other vst plugs).
Ok,im not the guy behind latest Madonna production but i've get lot's of appreciation (for the mastering quality in particular) from pro's all around da world including some guys that remixes stuff from people like George Michael,Simple Minds,Simply Red,Level 42 and a lot of others...
So,i think,with scope...u can!
Take a look to some of my stuff if u wanna ear something:
http://www.beatport.com/k.+wild
Ciao!
http://www.kwild.com
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kwild on 2006-06-05 15:31 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kwild on 2006-06-05 15:49 ]</font>
Ok,im not the guy behind latest Madonna production but i've get lot's of appreciation (for the mastering quality in particular) from pro's all around da world including some guys that remixes stuff from people like George Michael,Simple Minds,Simply Red,Level 42 and a lot of others...
So,i think,with scope...u can!
Take a look to some of my stuff if u wanna ear something:
http://www.beatport.com/k.+wild
Ciao!
http://www.kwild.com
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kwild on 2006-06-05 15:31 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kwild on 2006-06-05 15:49 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:36 pm
With these great tools, CW and 3rd party developers allow us to master ourselves. Isn't that why we bought into this platform?
Some people call Scope " the poor mans Pro Tools," I call it Pro Tools with Great Synths. Fairlight seems to enjoy CW's implementation of SHARC's. But you can easily master yourself with these tools. You must hear and think on multiple levels. Hell don't let the hype stop you, just think of the Blair Witch Project. You know the movie that broke all records with profit/ROI amounts. They spent very little money in pre, and post production, but their profits were phenominal, and they didn't believe in anything but themselves.
Strength Through Manipulation Of at0ms,
Some people call Scope " the poor mans Pro Tools," I call it Pro Tools with Great Synths. Fairlight seems to enjoy CW's implementation of SHARC's. But you can easily master yourself with these tools. You must hear and think on multiple levels. Hell don't let the hype stop you, just think of the Blair Witch Project. You know the movie that broke all records with profit/ROI amounts. They spent very little money in pre, and post production, but their profits were phenominal, and they didn't believe in anything but themselves.
Strength Through Manipulation Of at0ms,
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:04 pm
of course the sound quality is more than sufficient.
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:46 pm
I do mastering for dance music and scope/creamware is at the heart of that process.
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:09 pm
I have a studio workshop on Friday at the SAE.
I´ll make some promotion for Creamware then.
Would be nice to have at least one scope system in every SAE studio worldwide.
And it would be nice to sit between this deal
I´ll make some promotion for Creamware then.
Would be nice to have at least one scope system in every SAE studio worldwide.
And it would be nice to sit between this deal