what do you think about the best plugin of scopeplatform?
well, VDAT is just streaming to file what's passed between the DSPs, there's no big trick involved.
It only proofs the outstanding sound quality of Scope, but that's a matter of fact anyway
[/kidding]
yet VDAT could win some big points if it would flawlessly work with an Alesis hardware controller (BRC Big Remote Control).
This (once expensive) item is very affordable now, as more and more folks get rid of old Adats...
without degrading the rest I'd mention 2 as primus inter pares
Flexor and QuantumWave
the first as it extends the base system to an absolutely stunning degree, the latter because I cannot but admire how John 'translated' the idea of this complex monster
cheers, Tom
It only proofs the outstanding sound quality of Scope, but that's a matter of fact anyway

[/kidding]
yet VDAT could win some big points if it would flawlessly work with an Alesis hardware controller (BRC Big Remote Control).
This (once expensive) item is very affordable now, as more and more folks get rid of old Adats...
without degrading the rest I'd mention 2 as primus inter pares
Flexor and QuantumWave
the first as it extends the base system to an absolutely stunning degree, the latter because I cannot but admire how John 'translated' the idea of this complex monster

cheers, Tom
I like the Q-wave a lot too, but what idea are you talking about? As I understand it, this synth isn't "modelled" after any other synth or am I mistaken?On 2006-08-23 03:09, astroman wrote:
Flexor and QuantumWave
the first as it extends the base system to an absolutely stunning degree, the latter because I cannot but admire how John 'translated' the idea of this complex monster
I can't say I have any favourites yet, but I do have a few plugins I turn to quite often:
Q-Wave (for Pads and stuff)
Minimax (for Bass)
Vinco (to bring up the volume and the descrete details in any sound)
But I'm still exploring all my stuff so I guess my list is just as much a list of what usually does the job for me, not that that is a bad thing in any way.
I have some stuff coming in:
BX-digital (looking forward to see what this will do to my sound)
SPL T-Designer/Attacker (My beats needs something - I hope this is it

And one of these days I just gotta have them Warping reverbs

from the Zarg site:On 2006-08-23 03:54, petal wrote:
...As I understand it, this synth isn't "modelled" after any other synth or am I mistaken?...
Originally a custom project for Hans Zimmer, it is based on the functional design of the Waldorf Wave, using the Creamware Waldorf oscillators and the LP filter from the Pro One emulation (with an additional 12 dB HP filter). It is structured as a 4-part synth, meaning there are 4 individual synths inside the device (this being my first multi-timbre synth project). Potential customers should note that the Creamware version of the Waldorf oscillator does not produce the same quality of aliasing as the original, and therefore you should not expect the Quantum Wave to produce a faithful emulation of the Wave's sound.
It is not meant to be a 1:1 emulation of the Waldorf Wave, though I was able to get most of the Wave's functions implemented, adding or removing some things as necessary with a softsynth design. ...
cheers, Tom
ok.
I remembered the Hans Zimmer part, but I thought the idea of having 4 more or less individual synth under one design, was Bowens own, which, in my oppinion, is what really diferentiate this synth from anything else. It's this aspect of the synth I really enjoy working with in order to program progressive soundscapes, because it's design is so much more userfriendly, than opening 4 identical synths.
Then there's of course the sound of it too, but I'm not going to get into that here other than it's great!
Thanks for the education
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2006-08-23 05:38 ]</font>
I remembered the Hans Zimmer part, but I thought the idea of having 4 more or less individual synth under one design, was Bowens own, which, in my oppinion, is what really diferentiate this synth from anything else. It's this aspect of the synth I really enjoy working with in order to program progressive soundscapes, because it's design is so much more userfriendly, than opening 4 identical synths.
Then there's of course the sound of it too, but I'm not going to get into that here other than it's great!
Thanks for the education

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2006-08-23 05:38 ]</font>
- next to nothing
- Posts: 2521
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Bergen, Norway
- Gordon Gekko
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: paname
If you ask me for the best plugin, I'd look for something unreplaceable. Mixers are plenty, synths interchangeable. Don't misunderstand, I think Bowen, Wavelength and STW for example have released some extra-ordinary devices.
So for Scope's best devices: I think PsyQ is pretty unique, for example. What I also wouldn't know replacements for in VST-world is some of Orbitone's stuff, like Vorb or the Psy-fi series with their ultra smooth modulation effects.
At the t0p, to my personal opinion, the modular - I couldn't live without it. I wouldn't know how to start mimicking, on full synth DSP devices or in native software, the possibilities offered by basic patches. Or how to do cross-modulations between devices' parameters, let alone more advanced abstract operations. And still, once you have some insight, it's so easy to work with, be it to make new sounds from scratch or to manipulate live feeds...
Then there's more general options of this platform, which we all enjoy, mainly the extra-ordinary connectivity and zero latency, that make Scope a musician's wet dream.
So for Scope's best devices: I think PsyQ is pretty unique, for example. What I also wouldn't know replacements for in VST-world is some of Orbitone's stuff, like Vorb or the Psy-fi series with their ultra smooth modulation effects.
At the t0p, to my personal opinion, the modular - I couldn't live without it. I wouldn't know how to start mimicking, on full synth DSP devices or in native software, the possibilities offered by basic patches. Or how to do cross-modulations between devices' parameters, let alone more advanced abstract operations. And still, once you have some insight, it's so easy to work with, be it to make new sounds from scratch or to manipulate live feeds...
Then there's more general options of this platform, which we all enjoy, mainly the extra-ordinary connectivity and zero latency, that make Scope a musician's wet dream.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
-
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Home By The Sea
Sonic Timeworks P-100 reverb, for best effect.
4 Tap Chorus for best stock effect (you don't have to pay extra for it).
Orbitone's Vorb, for most unique application.
Prodyssey for best synth.
But .. the routing, modular, and real-time capabilities are what really make the system something out of the ordinary...
4 Tap Chorus for best stock effect (you don't have to pay extra for it).
Orbitone's Vorb, for most unique application.
Prodyssey for best synth.
But .. the routing, modular, and real-time capabilities are what really make the system something out of the ordinary...
- AudioIrony
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Mood Ring Umbrella Satchel
Scope platform itself is unbeatable.
For my simple needs, the only plug that I couldn't live without is Celmo's G.A.M.
I also like the Wavelenth synths and some of the stranger effects from De-Vice
For my simple needs, the only plug that I couldn't live without is Celmo's G.A.M.
I also like the Wavelenth synths and some of the stranger effects from De-Vice
---xxxxxxxx---
And Charlie said: "I'm cool with that" and set fire to a posh hammer to make it official
---xxxxxxxx---
And Charlie said: "I'm cool with that" and set fire to a posh hammer to make it official
---xxxxxxxx---