ZAM+ first update

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:50 pm

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .txt"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0 <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: sampler _____________________________________ EDIT: FILE DELETED on 12.10.2006. NEW UPDATE-PACK WILL ARRIVE SOON!

Updated ZAM+ with Shroomz potis and fixed some things. Finetune & Tuning now work (not in modular versions... too much work for now).

Martin

EDIT:
added new picture ;o)
modular-version only one instance possible... don't know why... but we'll see.

EDIT:
First beta upload!!!!!! (tuning does not work so far, is it possible to load on actual SFP? Any need of special DSP-files?)

EDIT:
Modular versions added (forgot it in the last zip)

EDIT:
Shroomz reported, that multiple instances are possible in Modular II.
I had problems with ModIII using multiple MOZAMs, would be interesting to hear more experiences. Can you visually arrange MOZAMSs in modular?

EDIT:
Fixed size of MOZAM4.
Multiple instances possible in Modular. Try to avoid overlapping, which leads to an error message.

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-09 14:02 ]

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-09 14:05 ]

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-09 14:21 ]

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-10-12 05:46 ] <a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/devices/ZAM+3.jpg" BORDER="0">

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:36 am

Finally I found out, how to build modular modules... a modular-sampleplayer is ready to post, but I will wait for creamwares response.

Martin

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:40 am

Whoah! I can't wait to try this & the modular version out. You could always just post the devices then remove them if CW object to your work, but I can't see there being a problem unless you were selling the devices.

[ This Message was edited by: Shroomz on 2006-09-03 05:40 ]

Lima · Post by **Lima** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:12 am

Thanks a lot Martin! I'm very curious to see the new coming devices!!!

wayne · Post by **wayne** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:05 am

Martin, you are one rockin' individual

If i ever make it to Germany, the beer's on me

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:02 am

The ghost of Don Corleone has sent a message saying you should post these devices immediately or he'll sanction a hit.

Janni · Post by **Janni** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:20 pm

Would be interesting if they are "crash resistant".
Just dreaming of a SFP-Battery...
With the modular version, its in my hands!

Please, give us YOUR body, Martin!
Can`t wait...

Cheers,
Jan

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:21 am

My body?

hifiboom · Post by **hifiboom** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:08 am

heh MCCYRANO, without bringing you down, but the 3D knobs don`t look that good in combination with the small old ones....

auf Deutsch: " das ist ein Stilbruch ! " (bitte nicht persönlich nehmen.)

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:33 am

Vollkommen deiner Meinung. Werde die Dinger einfach nochmal kleiner rechnen...
Der dunkle Schatten sieht auch noch nicht so gut aus...
Wer weiß, ob ich die ZAM+ je veröffentlichen darf. Habe von Creamware eindeutige Auskunft, sowas nur nach expliziter Bestätigung veröffentlichen zu dürfen...

Martin

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 6:08 am

Martin, I can make you versions of the any of our pots at whatever size you need. If Creamware allow you to post these devices just let me know if you need any modifications or changes.

There's several new versions of this style of pot available in the gui elements thread (smaller & a version without shadows) & also some new moog-style rotary switch pots which I posted today.

hifiboom · Post by **hifiboom** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:36 am

Martin, what about releasing your Pulsderzeit EQ with new gui elements?

You could integrate the two 12 db EQs strips into one 24db EQ stripe. At the moment its a little bit too complex. with that 8 parametric EQs...

best regards...

[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-05 10:37 ]

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:14 am

I had this idea too, just for the looks. I could add a "link" button for two EQs getting together 24db and synchronized in every parameter... btw. one of the two EQs has allways -values, one +, does this really make sense????? 24db and +/- values with long faders would make more sense, I think.

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:15 am

@ shroomz
Oh, yes, I will surely have some special wishes in the near future ;o)

THANKS FOR YOUR GREAT WORK AGAIN. THIS IS SO COOL, TO BE PART OF ALL THIS!!!!!!

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:14 am

Special wishes will be fullfilled ;¬)

Hey, you could add ADSR mod inputs on those modular versions!

hifiboom · Post by **hifiboom** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:13 pm

you are absolutly right. There should be something with the sound going on ...

You could upgrade the EQ to that kind of vintage Eq we already talked about, with some kind of distortion in the bands at higher gains....

I really really would like to have an SDK, too.
But first I have to get a Scope Professional board.

[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-06 05:32 ]

petal · Post by **petal** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:49 am

On 2006-09-05 12:14, Shroomz wrote:
Special wishes will be fullfilled ;¬)

Hey, you could add ADSR mod inputs on those modular versions!

Oh yes and if you could manipulate these parameters as well:

1. Startpoint (of sample/loop/zone)
2. Endpoint (of sample/loop/zone)

it would become a very powerful samplemanipulater.

All though Red told me that this wasn't possible at present time...

Cheers!
Thomas

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:32 am

On 2006-09-02 15:50, MCCYRANO wrote:
Are you hungry ?

After four days it's not hunger, it's starvation

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:25 pm

I'm sorry for that. Heard nothing from creamware so far. Maybe I'll email Ralf too, but think he's not the right adress for those things...

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:32 pm

@ petal

I think I can't influece program-parameters... Oh how would I love to!!!!! If creamware could open some sources for some free developers (I'd swear I'll give no insider information)it would be fantastic, cause for my purposes the STS samplers are not very good, but some simple modifications would make them real killers! This would be a way to push SCOPE-developement further without investing or risking anything. If they like what comes out, they could sell it, if not, who cares?

I will go in it more deeply this weekend. Actually I was very buisy (and luckily successful) with other things.

But worst thing is, that I can't promise anything, cause I don't know what our big "creator" will say...

Martin