PulsderZeit 8X +/- 24db EQ

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .txt"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: Effect<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> EDIT: FILE DELETED on 12.10.2006. NEW UPDATE-PACK WILL ARRIVE SOON!

... nothing more, nothing less...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-10-12 05:47 ]</font><BR><BR><a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/devices/Pdz24.jpg" BORDER="0">
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

well done MC! looks better now.

you still need the boxes around the text?

I would use just plain white text on the backround whithout the boxes...


and still: its more heavy on DSP than the EQ its modeled after. :grin: :lol:
The original may just be 18 or 24 dB EQ with 4 bands.

In fact yours has 8 x 12dB bands which will double your hit on DSP load.

And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM.
:smile:

Anyway thanks...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 03:59 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 04:00 ]</font>
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

No modeling anymore ;o)
P. is 12db per band... P. is one band +, one band - values...

With this EQ you can set + & - values with each band as u like and as it's usual with EQs ;o).

24db circuit needs simply double DSP.
Yes, I could make a button, to take second EQ from DSP, if just 12db needed, but there are enough 12db EQs out there...

So it's a 16x Parametric EQ (with 8 doubled 12db EQs) - nothing more, nothing less, nothing special. Special may be, that you are able take every 2 EQs from DSP...

I'm working on something special though ;o)))

Martin

Btw.
"And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM."

Per band? You just have 8 parametric bands now. One knob for freq, one for Q, one for gain. Thats a standard, i think.

EDIT:
and oh... I forgot... the old phase-issues are back ;o). I allready corrected it and will upload it later...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-12 05:38 ]</font>
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

On 2006-09-12 04:56, MCCYRANO wrote:
No modeling anymore ;o)
P. is 12db per band... P. is one band +, one band - values...

With this EQ you can set + & - values with each band as u like and as it's usual with EQs ;o).

24db circuit needs simply double DSP.
Yes, I could make a button, to take second EQ from DSP, if just 12db needed, but there are enough 12db EQs out there...

So it's a 16x Parametric EQ (with 8 doubled 12db EQs) - nothing more, nothing less, nothing special. Special may be, that you are able take every 2 EQs from DSP...

I'm working on something special though ;o)))

Martin

Btw.
"And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM."

Per band? You just have 8 parametric bands now. One knob for freq, one for Q, one for gain. Thats a standard, i think.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-12 04:59 ]</font>
okay you say its 8 x 24db (2x12db) paramteric EQ? So it will cost 4 x the standard PEQ4 form CW...

So I undertstand why its a DSP_hoog.
:smile:

okay I understand....

but why did you arranged them each 2 together and made them switchable on/off 2 together...
Don`t understand your graphical arrangement then...

First I thought you have 2 x 12db arranged together to reach 24db Gain...
But now I see that ist 2 x 24dbEQs
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

It just grows... I'm not that straight worker, who's steps allways make sense. Otherwise I may loose the fun of it.

I like to group things, so that it's easier to count... but that's a matter of taste. I could write numbers too.
I have enough DSPs, so there is no need in an on/off button for each single EQ.

As with dynaMYTH I see that I just share my personal (for others not allways easy to understand) devices with the pulsar community. I'm thinking 'bout taking at least a little bit money in the future for some devices for various reasons - but that's not decided so far...

Martin
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

B.t.w. hifiboom, thanks for your design-tips! White letters without light box look very good!
... but sorry, I'm working on a completely new version which won't be released too soon...

Martin
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

On 2006-09-12 07:05, MCCYRANO wrote:
B.t.w. hifiboom, thanks for your design-tips! White letters without light box look very good!
... but sorry, I'm working on a completely new version which won't be released too soon...

Martin
Jip! no problem.

IMO, these boxes make the device look overloaded and do not help in anyway.
:smile:

All you need is a good background bitmap, a contrasting easy to read textstyle and shroomz nice GUI elements...

And of course some unique algorithm behind...At least that is what really counts...
:smile:

best regards...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 07:21 ]</font>
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Thanks Martin :smile:
MCCY
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by MCCY »

I have to thank you! It's so wonderful to work with the new potis!!!!!

(I will build in credids in the next update.)

Martin
Post Reply