Magma & Ricoh hell
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:59 pm
I'm the (not quite yet) proud owner of a used 2-slot Magma with CardBus & Dec + Pericom chipset. Installed and running, but barely. I can get a single channel strip & two I/O working at 48Khz.
However, a 1-voice Minimax gives me the PCI limit message
I need help.
This is one of the cheaper Lenovo Thinkpads: model R61i, with a newer Ricoh cardbus controller (I know, I know...but bear with me) and PCI-E graphics (Mobile Intel 965 Express). USB and the other typical stuff.
I figured "PCI-E graphics! Cool - I won't have to worry about IRQ conflicts with the graphic chipset." WRONG.
Lots of stuff rolled into IRQ 16: Pulsar II, Ricoh 5C476, USB Universal Host Controller, and "Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family" (checked & it is in fact the graphics chip)
I know I can disable the USB (I lose 2 out of the 3 ports, and I don't gain anything PCI-wise). Can't disable the Ricoh CardBus controller of course. Resource changing is not allowed within Hardware/Devices (everything greyed out).
I have a patch installed that gets the Ricoh bandwith back to normal. This is something recent, and was independently verified & was a BIOS update from Lenovo.
I'm hopeful that my problem isn't still the Ricoh chipset, but instead he combination of graphics+USB+Pulsar on the same IRQ.
I'm good with PC configuration, with the exception of assigning resources. The BIOS doesn't have any obvious way of reassigning the IRQ for the graphics chipset. I'm expecting this to be nasty
So, here's a question for the Magma/CardBus folks: anybody know if IRQ sharing the CardBus controller with a Scope card is a performance problem? Or, is that normal, or even mandatory that they share IRQs?
I'm looking for advice on tactics
Reinstalling XP is definitely doable (ACPI?)
Also, if there's any way of measuring the performance to rule out (or in) the CardBus controller, I'm all ears!
However, a 1-voice Minimax gives me the PCI limit message

This is one of the cheaper Lenovo Thinkpads: model R61i, with a newer Ricoh cardbus controller (I know, I know...but bear with me) and PCI-E graphics (Mobile Intel 965 Express). USB and the other typical stuff.
I figured "PCI-E graphics! Cool - I won't have to worry about IRQ conflicts with the graphic chipset." WRONG.

Lots of stuff rolled into IRQ 16: Pulsar II, Ricoh 5C476, USB Universal Host Controller, and "Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family" (checked & it is in fact the graphics chip)
I know I can disable the USB (I lose 2 out of the 3 ports, and I don't gain anything PCI-wise). Can't disable the Ricoh CardBus controller of course. Resource changing is not allowed within Hardware/Devices (everything greyed out).
I have a patch installed that gets the Ricoh bandwith back to normal. This is something recent, and was independently verified & was a BIOS update from Lenovo.
I'm hopeful that my problem isn't still the Ricoh chipset, but instead he combination of graphics+USB+Pulsar on the same IRQ.
I'm good with PC configuration, with the exception of assigning resources. The BIOS doesn't have any obvious way of reassigning the IRQ for the graphics chipset. I'm expecting this to be nasty

So, here's a question for the Magma/CardBus folks: anybody know if IRQ sharing the CardBus controller with a Scope card is a performance problem? Or, is that normal, or even mandatory that they share IRQs?
I'm looking for advice on tactics

Also, if there's any way of measuring the performance to rule out (or in) the CardBus controller, I'm all ears!