22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
User avatar
asktoby
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:00 pm
Contact:

22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by asktoby »

Has anyone experienced this before?
In many applications I get 22ms gaps in the audio every 10s240ms.
They are always 22ms in length, and always occur at that spacing.
I've uploaded a recording to demonstrate this:
http://www.asktoby.com/Gaps.zip (7.7MB)

Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this?
It happens in numerous different applications that use the Scope "Wave Source 1", e.g. VLC media player, some games, etc.
However, if I have a sine generator running in Scope, there are no gaps: It must be a problem with the Wav playback.
I'm running Windows7 and two Scope Pulsar II cards with Scope V5.0.2617.
jhulk
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:49 am

Re: 22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by jhulk »

32bit or 64bit
User avatar
asktoby
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by asktoby »

32bit Windows.
elfan
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:51 am

Re: 22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by elfan »

Do the time between gaps or the length of the gaps themselves change if you change latency settings in Scope or if you change buffer settings in your application?
jhulk
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:49 am

Re: 22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by jhulk »

make sure you have upto date drivers as i had a driver that was playing up i got the latest one from sonic core

and all is well now

but on my system i lost all delays and reverbs

also cuasing poly problems in modular
User avatar
asktoby
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 22ms gaps in audio every 10s240ms.

Post by asktoby »

Elfan may have found the key!
I was set to 25ms latency (maximum for 44.1kHz).
I've reduced it to 13ms and all seems well. Don't want to speak too soon but I think it might be fixed.
Didn't expect *reducing* buffer size to fix a glitch problem. :D
Thank you!
Post Reply