In the old days, I used external gear for compression, reverb and enhancing.
I grouped many channels to one aux-path and fed it to the external gear.
Within scope, I do the same, but I think, scope is powerfull to copy&paste all effects to each single channel.
Is there an advantage/disadvantage to work with grouped effects ?
effects on auxgroup vs only within channels ?
-
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:55 am
effects on auxgroup vs only within channels ?
\\\ *** l 0 v e | X I T E *** ///
Re: effects on auxgroup vs only within channels ?
yes, and it depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
if it is a reverb that will provide an ambience for a whole mix, of course you want to use an aux bus.
if it is compression on a specific instrument, that should be inserted on the instrument's track.
if it is a compressor for several mics, like on a drumset, then sending everything to a group and compressing the group makes the most sense.
special FX for one track might as well be an insert on the track.
just do what makes most sense....
if it is a reverb that will provide an ambience for a whole mix, of course you want to use an aux bus.
if it is compression on a specific instrument, that should be inserted on the instrument's track.
if it is a compressor for several mics, like on a drumset, then sending everything to a group and compressing the group makes the most sense.
special FX for one track might as well be an insert on the track.
just do what makes most sense....