WHEN, HOW and WHY did you get a Creamware System?

Please remember the terms of your membership agreement.

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6683
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

I did get a Creamware Systema after a big study of the market, what i did for a whole year. It was crazy to get to know the different posibilities and so on... I felt completely lost, there were so many new Sound Cards at the moment... ujfffffff...

Well... I reached, by the end of 1998, enough knoeledge to choose a system. Send a email and got the system with Pulsar I Plus from Area51Uk, fantastic company in London, you can still reach. The curious thing is that i had never heard a thing... just got Pulsar by a logical reaserch, and I´ve finally got it. Its after that, that I have compered all the othere ones, and I was every time happier to find out the chosen card was the best of them all, even if it was damm expensive for me...

I was completely sure it was the best systema available and it was. I had to go through quite a few headeaches to understand the working of digital technology, but it was worth the effort and I now know more and less, how to handle the whole thing, but Pulsar it´s a crazy product... I can constantly do experiments and new things that surprise me. I LOVE THIS!!!

I think it´s very interesting to get to know when, how and why everybody here got their one Pulsar System. Cheers.
Nestor. :smile:
*MUSIC* The most Powerful Language in the world! *INDEED*
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Almost the same process here. I spent loads of money in soundcards before, none where doing what it's suppose do to correctly.
I lost all patience, and then i decided studied every specs, features, possibilities of soundcards from websites, etc...

I found the site http://www.kvr-vst.com which had a search engine for soundcards. I made a search for all companies having a soundcard with latencies under 14ms... That was my goal at that time.

Creamware, plus a couple others showed up in the results. Studied only those, then narrowed it to 3 models:

RME Hammerfall 96/36
Digi001
Creamware

Then checked pros&cons, prices, features compatibilities...

Creamware where the big winner here! The rest is known to planetz members.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2002-10-23 12:47 ]</font>
Chill69
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Chill69 »

I remember reading an article on Harmony Central back in the early 90's about a new form of soundcard - the thing called a Creamware Pulsar. After reading about it and studying it, I decided I had to have it. Unfortunately for me though, I was a sophmore in Highschool and had no where near the amount of money needed to buy one. So i continued making music with FastTracker on my P100 with my SB16 (I tried to buy an Awe32 Gold, but my parents wouldn't let me, they said 200$ was too much for a soundcard...). So I continued wanting a Creamware card for 5 years. After a bit of time off from music from the good ol' Army and a bit of college, I took an electronic music class to learn about the new technology. It was like falling off a log, within the week, I had already fired up FT2 and begun reading mags and the internet again in search of an audio card. After making some choices (some good, some bad)I settled on a few: The Echo Darla, A Terratec 88, A Creamware Luna, and my one choice unobtainable - the MOTU 1024 system. I stayed this way for almost 2 years, until my girlfriend at the time got sick of watching me curse at my hotrodded Live! card, and secretly ordered me a Luna II on ebay for my birthday. Somehow she knew that was my favorite, though I don't know how. Sadly, we're not together anymore, though we are great friends. She has a wonderful voice (I'm routinely trying to get her to sing for me, but she just won't have it), and she still supports my music in anyway she can. After using my Luna for a few months now, I'm just trying to figure out how in the world I'm going to get her help purchasing a Scope board (Darn that DSP is addictive!) :wink: J/K, but once again it looks like I'm saving up for the future again.

Chris
coc999
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Idonotknowanymore
Contact:

Post by coc999 »

when?august 2000 i get a pulsar with xlr connectors.

how?i wake up with lot of money (for me)
in my pockets and go direct to the shop:)

why?I worked with an atari and an akai s20 and wanted to progress in my works a friend of mine tell me "Creamware is a great system you will have a good engine for long "
I wanted the best for the lowest price(the legendary basic commercial argument )and even if i knew nothing about electronic and midi music i felt that it was great system.
To resume i choose it more for other reasons than good technical analyze reasons.. i'm a lucky pulsarian.
PS:in the first shop where i ask ,the guy tell me with a big smile "HEY that's greaaaat you will do bzzz,krzzzz,wzzzz,wizzzzz etc...hollywood....i'm arriving" i tell him "does i look so stupid??" and go out in an other shop where a guy tell me "you have some modules,evolutive way to work,free routing system,good conversion signal etc.." i take pulsar in that shop ...it is always better to be considered like an intelligent human beeing...
snoopy4ever
Posts: 367
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Costa Rica

Post by snoopy4ever »

I decided to get a PulsarII early this year.. first I was kind of impressed with the XTC approach because I love Cubase, then on the CW website saw that I also would be able to route the sound any way I wanted. And because the small space I have on my studio the "software" synths and modules (that are likely more hardware than software) called my attention. So the first chance I had to flight to Atlanta and look for that card was my priority,... , but when in Atlanta I found no CW dealer so I got back dissapointed, (well.. not much a couple of new mics and an external Hard Disk on my pack), then all you guys here leaded me to Infinite Vortex, where Subhuman was working at that time *THANKS SUB!!!*, he helped me a lot, so I received my Pulsar II , and I'm delighted and HAPPY!!.. :grin:. That's the best spended money.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: snoopy4ever on 2002-10-23 14:46 ]</font>
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

3 summers ago, I was looking for someone to cooperate to do music. I had a pc, mc-505 and a Pc1600x. Had a basic understanding of DAW an making music on it. A friend led me to someone 'who was into that aswell'. The guy had a great sampler, Cubase and 2 Pulsar1's. He used it to send midi to his S-5000, and routed the sampler to his hifi. His problem was he had no idea how these Pulsars worked. He gave them to me, to study them and make a setup.

After I had the cards for 2 years and really got the hang of them, I bought myself a Pulsar2 and Luna2496 to expand the Pulsar1's. Last summer we sold the Pulsar1's and I got a Scope SRB instead.

So it's very incidental that I ran into Creamware, but it's one of the better things that happened to me :wink:
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

For me, I already had a DSP board. The Yamaha DSP Factory. I the whole "hardware controlled by softwar" thing was pretty phenomenal for me, and I was amazed at the quality it delivered.. compared to the DX effects of that time. This was like 4 years ago.

So, I worked with DSP Factory for about 2 years. And also got my beloved Nord Modular. Modular synthesis! Wow! Totally new concept! And by the time I got the hang of Nord Mod, I was wondering why DSP Factory wasn't programmable at all, even though it was just a bunch of DSPs, just like Nord Mod. (coincidentally, this was when I was studying Csound) And, I looked all over the net for programmable DSP cards. I believe Pulsar was the only one.

But, the price was just out of this world! I just invested in Nord Mod, and was broke through my pants. So I waited about 2 years, worked my butt off in a couple of movie projects, and finally got my Pulsar II during the summer of '01. (that's when I joined PlanetZ)

Now, I'm fiddlin' more than earnin', and I'm dead broke again. But when I'm through fiddling with Pulsar? I'll be earning like a madman! I'd better be. :lol:
siberiansun
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by siberiansun »

I started to make music for tv commercials, a friend of mine owns a local tv-station, about 5 years ago.
at that point i didn't have squat so i had to do my recordings in a studio at work.

since my owner of a tv-station-friend obviously earn more money than a rock-music-teacher i managed to talk/hazzle/nag him into pre-pay me enough to buy my first daw: a roland jv-1010 and a soundblaster live.... (yeah, the crowd goes ooooooh).

That setup plus guitar, bass and a condenser microphone has pretty much been my "studio" until august this year when i got a rather big tax return.
since the release of soft synths like pro-52 and b4 my first objective was to get something that ran on asio with acceptable latency. my sb live surely didn't and my local dealer suggested the m-audio audiophile.

Well, the store was out of audiophiles but he "happened" to mention that he HAD a slightly more expensive card, "you know..if you're interested". well nice sale talk there buddy i thought but i was eager to upgrade my system and the whole idea with onboard processors sounded great.

took me a while, in fact as you may have noticed, i'm still far away from taking full advantage of my luna 2 but i value my card more and more each day!! the sound quality is outstanding and the possibilities with it is far beyond my current needs!

i also realize, listening in on all of planetz discussions, the cw cards ain't exactly used by monkeys:) but by REAL intelligent musicians.
proud to be a member of this community!
sincerely.
Immanuel
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Post by Immanuel »

Chill69

As far as I recall, Pulsar1 was introduced in 1998.
algorhythm
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by algorhythm »

yes, it was introduced in 98, but they took many years to develop it before hand (5 or more?). . . .
Chill69
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Texas

Post by Chill69 »

It could have been in the mid 90's then, honestly I'm not sure. Most of high school was a blur to me :grin:.. first the memory then the hair... or is it the other way around, I can't remember...

Chris
User avatar
sandrob
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Slavonski Brod - Croatia
Contact:

Post by sandrob »

i choosed pulsar2+ about 2-3 years ago because my friend told me: "pulsar is good".
yes, he told me about latency, dsp, efects, synths, bla-bla... but onestly, i didn't know what he talking about, because i didn't had experience with any other soundcard before. i just heard for "some yamaha card". on island where i live nobody have pro-soundcard.
so, first i bought pulsar than my first pc. then i learned how to turn pc on, but i must called neiber to show me how to turn off - yes, it's true :oops:
with the LITTLE help from my planetz's friends now i handle with all this stuff... even my english goes better. i know, my english is still terible, but it's "english" :roll:
so, this is opportunity to say: "THANKS"! :smile:
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

I was always a hardware nut. Over the years I'd collected, sold and rebought masses of synths and samplers starting with the Korg MonoPoly and pro-One and ending with an EPS-16. I did most of my music with my music partner at his studio, but also had a small home set-up. About two years ago (is that all?!) I decided that my home set-up was getting a bit old and songs had stopped "falling out" of the machines.

I already used computers about 12 hours a day and was pretty familar with sequencing hardware with VST, so my first thought was: "I'm not going to have anything on computer. I'm sick of fiddling and tweaking. EVERYTHING will be hardware, including the sequencer."

Nice idea, but when I started adding up what it was all going to cost me I felt a bit ill. I could either get a good hardware sequencer/sampler OR a good workstation.

So at the suggestion of my studio partner I started looking at the computer-based options. I researched like crazy and after many late nights on the web I was simply confused.

How many voices could I get ? How choked would my PC be (just a PII 450 at the time) ? I was seriously considering Reaktor until I went to a music shop and they just shook their head when I told them what PC and sound card I had. It seemed I needed a new PC, new soundcard and Reaktor.

"What else have you got ?" I asked. The salesman pulled out the Pulsar-II box. Well, I'd read about it on the web but it wasn't clear to me at all how it really worked and what you got.

I asked him to set it up so I could have a listen. He turned a bit green and said that it was too complex and it'd take then a couple of weeks at least.

So I offered to take it on 7-days approval.

Well, for the first day I couldn't get a single f^%$*king sound out of thing. I was going nuts. The routing window struck me as confusing and complex.

But after another few days everything came good. I downloaded the free ModV2 and fell in love with it immediately. It was so superior to the rather lame stock synths.

I was a bit disppointed there was no sampler included and so bought the STS-3000. I perservered with it for a while, but since I don't use sample CDs, I found it exremely unfriendly and slow and have never used it since.

The first few weeks were heady though: I discovered all the free devices and was downloading and tweaking like crazy.

I've often said that the Pulsar-II was the best bit of kit I've ever bought and still believe that to be true. It's a brilliant card which has just got better with every update :smile:

But don't think that'll stop me from complaining about it :wink:
Micha
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by Micha »

I had a soundblaster and cleaned old tapes with Dart. The result was poor, hours of declicking and denoising and as result the sound of a 40's radio. So I found out "Yes, it works" and needed a good soundcard. But all good soundcards, like Pinnacle or Terratec, were ISA. So: Waiting for PCI card (in 96). Then things moved suddenly fast (in 98). Event, Yamaha and Creamware, the first high quality PCIs. Pulsar was really good with 20/24 AD/DA and >100 db. And the option to have, maybe, in the future, some toys to play on. That seems interesting, maybe.
So in spring 99 I got me one. Not cheap, but excellent sound, as I heard after more hours of remake. (Remember these "whatever you hear it's crap" PC "Sound Systems"? So the truth only came out after burning and playing the CD with the HiFi Set.)
The wake up bell rang with the first of the christmas updates and John Bowen's Orion. They demonstrated, for me, for the first time, that this card could do more then just some additional toys for playin' around a bit.
That is why today I'm sitting in a studio with tons of synths, mixers, effects etc. and only can assure to you:
I'm totally innocent - but it's good to have :razz: for
Happy pulsaring
Micha
Retro
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Oz

Post by Retro »

Hello, this is turning into another one of Nestor's super-threads :smile:

Some of you might remember when I first posted here I didn't even own any CW gear. At the time I was pretty skeptical of studio-in-a-box packages and was only looking for a reliable recording system. I already had a stack of outboard gear and I wasn't very impressed with any of the software synths I'd heard. Thanks to you guys and a couple of other sources, I was convinced that the Pulsar was the way to go. I didn't realise this decision would lead me to a whole new world of quality virtual devices, and now my digital mixer is gathering dust in a corner!

If you don't remember my first post, you might remember the one when I got my Pulsar. I was so excited, I wanted to know if there was a special interface that would allow me to perform "unnatural" acts with it! :lol:

I decided to give that idea away and got an A16 Ultra and Scope SRB instead... It's the next best thing I guess :smile:
Spirit
Posts: 2661
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Terra Australis

Post by Spirit »

I remember ! :lol: :lol:
User avatar
bassdude
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ACT, Australia

Post by bassdude »

Yeah I remember the unatural acts thread too. Choice thread. :grin:
j9k
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: san diego
Contact:

Post by j9k »

a friend had mentioned it one day and i didn't think about it until a few months later until it just popped into my head one day and decided to check out the website. i totally flipped out and went to my local music store and coincidentally they had just gotten them in that day(ask ray at professional sound and music in san diego). i bought a pulsar 1 and an a16.

most of my music is made by different signal routings. the other thing i like about it is the ability to load effects and delete them unlike their physical counterparts which break and are heavy.

j9k
spoimala
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by spoimala »

I also wrote my first posts (er, dozens of them) befor I had any CW gear. And it's only..a week I have had one - Scope/SP.

First time I heard of SCOPE seriously about...a year ago when my friend bought a Pulsar2. He was very satisfied with it and I tried it a few times, looked good. Then, another friend of mine was lookng for a cheap but quality card, I suggested him a Luna. And then I could try SFP more and more.
But I remembered Pulsar had some nice synths, so I had to go visit the pulsar guy again, and ooh, I fell in love at the first 'sight' with some Vectron presets.

But maybe the most of the honor of having me have a scope belongs to PlanetZ. I asked questions here, looked for many many threads and got convinced it is QUALITY board. And that I'll have friends here to ask if I need some help :smile: Thank you, guys! If ever any of you is coming to Finland, let me know.

Now, I'm thinking of buying a digital mixer in fron of my Scope, maybe Behringer DDX3216. Does anyone have any opinions on it? Retro, what mixer do you have? Wanna sell it? :smile:
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

i was shopping for a solution to finish my studio.i knew i wanted to control everything from my computer.i went to a store called electronic music box(now out of business) and they told me that the pulsar card would make this possible.i then had to wait 6 months to get my pulsar1 v1.2 from germany as there were NONE in the states.

i then had to begin to learn computers as my first hardware choices were poor(and i had a bad mobo).crash-o-rama commenced.i got a new mobo and everything began to fall in place and i found my self productive at last!

thanks to all in this forum who taught and continue to teach me so much!
Post Reply