PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

<a name="planetz-file"></a><a href="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/dev ... .txt"><img src="/forums/images/file_icon.gif" border="0" alt=" File"> File</a><BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Price ($USD): 0<BR> <a name="planetz-tag"></a>Type: Effect<BR> _____________________________________<BR><BR> EDIT: FILE DELETED on 12.10.2006. NEW UPDATE-PACK WILL ARRIVE SOON!

... nothing more, nothing less...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-10-12 05:47 ]</font><BR><BR><a name="planetz-fileimage"></a><IMG SRC="http://www.planetz.com/Pulsar/files/devices/Pdz24.jpg" BORDER="0">

well done MC! looks better now.

you still need the boxes around the text?

I would use just plain white text on the backround whithout the boxes...


and still: its more heavy on DSP than the EQ its modeled after.
The original may just be 18 or 24 dB EQ with 4 bands.

In fact yours has 8 x 12dB bands which will double your hit on DSP load.

And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM.


Anyway thanks...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 03:59 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 04:00 ]</font>

No modeling anymore ;o)
P. is 12db per band... P. is one band +, one band - values...

With this EQ you can set + & - values with each band as u like and as it's usual with EQs ;o).

24db circuit needs simply double DSP.
Yes, I could make a button, to take second EQ from DSP, if just 12db needed, but there are enough 12db EQs out there...

So it's a 16x Parametric EQ (with 8 doubled 12db EQs) - nothing more, nothing less, nothing special. Special may be, that you are able take every 2 EQs from DSP...

I'm working on something special though ;o)))

Martin

Btw.
"And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM."

Per band? You just have 8 parametric bands now. One knob for freq, one for Q, one for gain. Thats a standard, i think.

EDIT:
and oh... I forgot... the old phase-issues are back ;o). I allready corrected it and will upload it later...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-12 05:38 ]</font>

On 2006-09-12 04:56, MCCYRANO wrote:
No modeling anymore ;o)
P. is 12db per band... P. is one band +, one band - values...

With this EQ you can set + & - values with each band as u like and as it's usual with EQs ;o).

24db circuit needs simply double DSP.
Yes, I could make a button, to take second EQ from DSP, if just 12db needed, but there are enough 12db EQs out there...

So it's a 16x Parametric EQ (with 8 doubled 12db EQs) - nothing more, nothing less, nothing special. Special may be, that you are able take every 2 EQs from DSP...

I'm working on something special though ;o)))

Martin

Btw.
"And the usage with 4 knobs + Q per band is quite strange ATM."

Per band? You just have 8 parametric bands now. One knob for freq, one for Q, one for gain. Thats a standard, i think.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-09-12 04:59 ]</font>

okay you say its 8 x 24db (2x12db) paramteric EQ? So it will cost 4 x the standard PEQ4 form CW...

So I undertstand why its a DSP_hoog.


okay I understand....

but why did you arranged them each 2 together and made them switchable on/off 2 together...
Don`t understand your graphical arrangement then...

First I thought you have 2 x 12db arranged together to reach 24db Gain...
But now I see that ist 2 x 24dbEQs

It just grows... I'm not that straight worker, who's steps allways make sense. Otherwise I may loose the fun of it.

I like to group things, so that it's easier to count... but that's a matter of taste. I could write numbers too.
I have enough DSPs, so there is no need in an on/off button for each single EQ.

As with dynaMYTH I see that I just share my personal (for others not allways easy to understand) devices with the pulsar community. I'm thinking 'bout taking at least a little bit money in the future for some devices for various reasons - but that's not decided so far...

Martin

B.t.w. hifiboom, thanks for your design-tips! White letters without light box look very good!
... but sorry, I'm working on a completely new version which won't be released too soon...

Martin

On 2006-09-12 07:05, MCCYRANO wrote:
B.t.w. hifiboom, thanks for your design-tips! White letters without light box look very good!
... but sorry, I'm working on a completely new version which won't be released too soon...

Martin

Jip! no problem.

IMO, these boxes make the device look overloaded and do not help in anyway.


All you need is a good background bitmap, a contrasting easy to read textstyle and shroomz nice GUI elements...

And of course some unique algorithm behind...At least that is what really counts...


best regards...

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-12 07:21 ]</font>

Thanks Martin

I have to thank you! It's so wonderful to work with the new potis!!!!!

(I will build in credids in the next update.)

Martin